Note: The risk of bias by domain corresponds to the highest risk of bias among outcomes by domain.
The overall risk of bias corresponds to the overall highest risk of bias assessed among outcomes.
| Bias | Author's judgement | Support for judgement |
| Confounding |
Serious |
The analysis matched by sex, 10-year age group, nationality, reason for PCR testing, and calendar week of PCR test. Our prespecified important confounding domains of comorbidity and socioeconomic status were not controlled for, leading to a likelihood of uncontrolled confounding. |
| Selection of participants into the study |
Moderate |
The study used a test-negative design. This has the potential to suffer from selection bias by being restricted to individuals getting a test, although the issues are not yet well understood. |
| Clasification of interventions |
Low |
No particular concerns in this domain - vaccination status is likely to be adequately measured. |
| Deviations from intervention |
Low |
No concerns in this domain - the study is observational. |
| Missing outcome data |
Low |
No concerns in this domain - data on vaccination status, confunders and outcome available for all participants. |
| Measurement of the outcome |
Low |
No particular concerns in this domain - determination of infection unlikely to be biased. |
| Selection of the reported results |
Moderate |
There is no evidence of an analysis plan, and we have concerns that results could have been selected for reporting because of the findings. |
| Overall risk of bias |
Serious |
|
| Overall comment | Concerns over uncontrolled confounding, particularly by socioeconomic status and comorbidities |