Trial NCT04566770
Publication Zhu F, Clin Infect Dis, 2021
Dates: 2020-09-24 to 2020-11-28
Funding: Mixed (National Key R&D Program of China and CanSino Biologics; support from Beijing Institute of Biotechnology)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT | |
Location :
Single center / China Follow-up duration (months): 8 | |
5×10¹⁰ vp Ad5-vectored (n = 100) 10×10¹⁰ vp Ad5-vectored (n = 100) Placebo (n = 50) | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Intervention
2 IM doses of Ad5-nCoV 5×10¹⁰ vp, 56 days apart 2 IM doses of Ad5-nCoV 10×10¹⁰ vp, 56 days apart |
|
Control
2 IM doses of placebo, 56 days apart | |
Participants | |
Randomized 250 participants | |
Characteristics of participants Type of participants: Healthy volunteers aged 56 and up N=250 160 males Children: 0 Pregnant women: 0 Immunocompromized patients: 0 Mean age: Age range: NR | |
Description of participants Healthy volunteers aged 56 years and above that were HIV-negative and SARS-CoV-2 infection-free in a single centre in China. | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1. Safety indexes of adverse reactions [Time Frame: within 14 days post each vaccination]: Occurrence of adverse reactions post vaccination. 2. Immunogencity indexes of GMT [Time Frame: Day 28 post the second vaccination]: Evaluate the Geometric mean titer (GMT) of IgG antibody. 3. Immunogencity indexes of neutralizing antibody [Time Frame: Day 28 post the second vaccination]: Evaluate the Geometric mean titer (GMT) of neutralizing antibody. | |
In the report 1. Incidence of adverse reactions within 14 days after each vaccination. 2. GMT of RBD-specific ELISA antibodies on day 28 after boost vaccination. 3. GMT of pseudovirus neutralising antibodies on day 28 after boost vaccination. | |
Documents available |
Protocol NR Statistical plan * Data-sharing stated:
No |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Low |
General comment | In addition to the accepted manuscript, the supplementary materials and study registry were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Neither protocol nor statistical analysis plan was available at the time of data extraction. This phase 2b trial included 3 cohorts (children (n=150), younger adults (n=30), and older adults (n=250)) with different intervention arms for each cohort. Here we present data and risk of bias assessments for the largest cohort: older adults. The target sample size specified in the registry was achieved. Serious adverse events, a pre-specified outcome, was not reported per intervention group. There were no other important differences between registry and report in population, procedures, or interventions. |