Trial NCT04640402
Publication Meng F, Signal Transduct Tar, 2021
Funding: Public/non profit (Jiangsu Province Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
)
Conflict of interest:
Methods | |
RCT | |
Location :
Single center / China Follow-up duration (months): 1.91 | |
COVID-19 vaccine (Sf9 cells) 20 mcg D0/21 (n=200) COVID-19 vaccine (Sf9 cells) 40 mcg D0/21 (n=200) COVID-19 vaccine (Sf9 cells) 20 mcg D0/14/28 (n=200) COVID-19 vaccine (Sf9 cells) 40 mcg D0/14/28 (n=200) Placebo D0/21 or D0/14/28 n=160) | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Intervention
3 IM doses of 20 mcg at day 0/14/28 2 IM doses of 40 mcg, 22 days apart 2 IM doses of 20 mcg, 22 days apart 3 IM doses of 40 mcg at day 0/14/28 |
|
Control
2 IM injections, 22 days apart or 3 IM injections, 15 days apart from first dose, and 29 days apart from first dose | |
Participants | |
Randomized 960 participants | |
Characteristics of participants Type of participants: Healthy volunteers N=960 460 males Children: 0 Pregnant women: 0 Immunocompromized patients: 0 Mean age: Age range: NR | |
Description of participants Healthy adults with no history of COVID-19 in a single centre in China | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1. Geometric mean (GMT) of specific antibody [ Time Frame: 1 months after immunization in each study group ] Geometric mean (GMT) of specific antibody against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Spike protein Receptor-binding domain(S-RBD) protein (ELISA) 2. The incidence of adverse reaction (AR) [ Time Frame: 0 to 7 days after vaccination in each study group ] The incidence of adverse reaction (AR) | |
In the report 1. GMT of RBD-specific ELISA antibody responses at 30 days after the last dose vaccination. 2. The incidence of adverse reactions within 7 days after each dose vaccination. | |
Documents available |
Protocol NR Statistical plan * Data-sharing stated:
Yes, All individual data will not be available until the end of the one-year immune persistence observation |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the study registry was used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment.Study protocol and statistical analysis plan were not available at the time of data extraction. The published article reports on phases 1 and 2 of the trial. They study achieved the sample size specified in the registry.There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. The randomization was made by dose, schedule and age group (18-55; >=56), for the purpose of this review age groups were pooled during extraction. |