Trial NCT05197153
Publication Estephan L, Vaccine, 2023
Dates: 2022-01-22 to 2022-04-28
Funding: Mixed (Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corporation (MVC) and Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI)
)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT | |
Location :
Multicenter / Taiwan Follow-up duration (months): 5.16 | |
1/2 MVC-COV190 = (n=81) MVC-COV190 = (n=79) ChAdOx1 = (n=81) mRNA-1273 = (n=82) | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Intervention
One IM dose of MVC-COV1901 between 84 to 365 days after ChadOx1 prime vaccination Half IM dose of mRNA-1273 between 84 to 365 days after ChadOx1 prime vaccination Half IM dose of MVC-COV1901 between 84 to 365 days after ChAdOx1 prime vaccination |
|
Control
One IM dose of ChAdOx1 between 84 to 365 days after ChadOx1 prime vaccination | |
Participants | |
Randomized 323 participants | |
Characteristics of participants Type of participants: Adults N=323 175 males Children: 0 Pregnant women: 0 Immunocompromized patients: 0 Mean age: Age range: NR | |
Description of participants Adults who received ChAdOx1, mRNA-1273, or MVC-COV1901 as prime vaccination with no history of COVID-19 , in 4 centers in Taiwan | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Incidence of Adverse Events from Day 1 to 28 [ Time Frame: Day1 to 28 days after vaccination ];Primary Immunogenicity-1 [ Time Frame: Day1 to Day 29 ] Anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody GMT; Primary Immunogenicity-2 [ Time Frame: Day1 to Day 29 ] Seroconversion rate (SCR); Primary Immunogenicity-3 [ Time Frame: Day1 to Day 29 ] Anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody GMR; Primary Immunogenicity-4 [ Time Frame: Day1 to Day 29 ] Anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody serum response rate | |
In the report The assessment of the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of heterologous booster dose with AZD1222, mRNA-1273, or MVC-COV1901. | |
Documents available |
Protocol NR Statistical plan * Data-sharing stated:
Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to all available versions of the published article, the study registry and supplementary material were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment.The target sample size specified in the registry was not achieved (960 vs 804 participants).The article presented interim analyses for a study with ongoing follow-up.There were no important differences between registry and published report in population, procedures, interventions or outcomes. |