Trial *
Publication Hannawi S, J Infect, 2022
Dates: 2022-01-18 to 2022-04-05
Funding: Mixed (Beijing Science and Technology Plan Project, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Sinocelltech Ltd.)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT | |
Location :
Single center / UAE Follow-up duration (months): 1 | |
20 mcg SCTV01C (n=79) 40 mcg SCTV01C (n=80) Placebo (n=75) |
|
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Intervention
1 IM dose of 20 mcg SCTV01C 3-24 months following completion of the BBIBP-CorV primary series 1 IM dose of 40 mcg SCTV01C 3-24 months following completion of the BBIBP-CorV primary series |
|
Control
1 IM dose of placebo 3-24 months following completion of the BBIBP-CorV primary series | |
Participants | |
Randomized 234 participants | |
Characteristics of participants Type of participants: Adults N=234 0 males Children: 0 Mean age: Age range: NR | |
Description of participants Adults previously vaccinated with primary series of BBIBP-CorV with no history of COVID-19 in a single center in the United Arab Emirates. | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register NR | |
In the report 1) incidence and severity of adverse reactions (ARs) within 7 days after vaccination, adverse events (AEs) within 7 days, unsolicited AEs within 28 days, laboratory abnormalities related AEs within 14 days, serious adverse events (SAEs), AEs of special interest (AESIs) and medically attended AEs (MAAEs) within 365 days, after vaccination. 2) geometric mean concentration (GMC) of the specific spike binding IgG antibodies against spike protein of wild-type SARS-COV-2 strain on day 28 after vaccination (D28) and GMTs of neutralizing antibodies (live virus neutralization assay) to Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529) variants on D28, and the fold increase of these GMC and GMT from baseline (before vaccination). | |
Documents available |
Protocol NR Statistical plan * Data-sharing stated:
Yes, When the trials are complete |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the supplement was used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The protocol, registry and statistical analysis plan were not available. This was a letter to the editor that did not report a registry therefore we cannot determine if the procedures, interventions or outcomes were determined a priori. Preliminary analysis of those with at least 28 days follow-up. |