Trial NCT04646590
Publication Dai L, N Engl J Med, 2022
Dates: 2020-12-12 to 2021-12-15
Funding: Mixed (The National Science and Technology Major Project; the National Natural Science Foundation of China; the Chinese Academy of Sciences; Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical.)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT | |
Location :
Multicenter / Uzbekistan, Indonesia, Pakistan, Ecuador, China. Follow-up duration (months): 12 | |
25 mcg ZF2001 (n = 14453) Placebo (adjuvant) (n = 14451) |
|
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Intervention
3 IM doses of 25 mcg ZF2001 vaccine, each 30 days apart |
|
Control
3 IM doses of adjuvant placebo, each 30 days apart | |
Participants | |
Randomized 28904 participants | |
Characteristics of participants Type of participants: Adults N=28904 19521 males Children: 0 Pregnant women: 0 Immunocompromized patients: 0 Mean age: Age range: 18-92 | |
Description of participants Adults 18 years of age or older with no history of Covid-19, positive tests for SARS-CoV-2 exposure or vaccination, or of congenital or acquired immune deficiency or autoimmune disease at 32 clinical centers across Uzbekistan, Indonesia, Pakistan, Ecuador and China. | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1. The number of any severity of COVID-9 cases 14 days to one year after whole vaccination; 2. Adverse events from the first dose of vaccination until 30 days after full course of vaccination; 3. Serious adverse events from the first dose of vaccination until 12 months after full course of vaccination. | |
In the report Real-time PCR–confirmed symptomatic Covid-19 occurring at least 7 days after the third dose. | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing stated:
Yes, With publication |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the trial registry, protocol, statistical analysis plan and supplementary appendices were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. The article presented interim analyses for a study with ongoing follow-up. There were no important differences between protocol/registry and published report in population, procedures, interventions or outcomes for efficacy and safety outcomes. The protocol and registry report immunogenicity outcomes, but none were reported in this paper. The trial (n = 28,904) achieved the target sample size reported in the article (n = 28,000), but not the target sample size in the registry (n = 29,000). |