Trial NCT04962906; NCT05027672
Publication Macchia A, Lancet Reg Health Am, 2022
Dates: 2021-07-06 to 2021-08-03
Funding: Public/non profit (the Buenos Aires City Government)
Conflict of interest: no COI
Methods | |
RCT | |
Location :
Single center / Argentina Follow-up duration (months): 1 | |
rAd26/rAd5 (n = 150) rAd26/ChAdOx1 (n = 150) rAd26/BBIBP-CorV (n = 65) rAd26/rAd26 (n = 87) rAd26/mRNA-1273 (n = 88) |
|
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Intervention
1 IM dose rAd26 (1st component of Sputnik V) + 1 IM dose ChAdOx1, at least 30 days apart 2 IM doses rAd26 (= 2 x 1st component of Sputnik V regimen), at least 30 days apart 1 IM dose rAd26 (1st component of Sputnik V) + 1 IM dose m-RNA-1273, at least 30 days apart 1 IM dose rAd26 (1st component of Sputnik V) + 1 IM dose BBIBP-CorV, at least 30 days apart |
|
Control
1 IM dose rAd26 + 1 IM dose rAd5 (standard Sputnik V regimen), at least 30 days apart | |
Participants | |
Randomized 540 participants | |
Characteristics of participants Type of participants: Adults N=540 297 males Children: 0 Pregnant women: 0 Immunocompromized patients: 0 Mean age: Age range: NR | |
Description of participants Adults who had received the first dose (rAd26) of the Sputnik V vaccine at least 30 days earlier and no history of SARS-CoV-2 at a single centre in Argentina | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1. ELISA assessment of IgG anti Spike (UI/ml) [ Time Frame: 28 days ]; 2. Serious adverse events of special interest [ Time Frame: 28 days ] | |
In the report Geometric mean concentration ratio (SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG) at 28 days | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing stated:
Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the study registry (dated a few days after recruitment started) and protocol were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The paper reported on two similar trials in a combined analysis. The target sample size specified in the registry was achieved. There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. The primary immunogenicity outcome in the registry and protocol corresponded to the primary outcome in the report. The registry also reports safety outcomes as primary, but not the article. |