Trial ChiCTR2100051998
Publication Cao Y, Cell Res, 2021
Funding: Mixed (Ministry of Science and Technology of China; Sinovac Biotech Ltd. provided CoronaVac vaccines; Longcom Biologic Pharmacy provided ZF2001 vaccines.
)
Conflict of interest: no COI
Methods | |
RCT | |
Location :
Single center / China Follow-up duration (months): 0.5 | |
CoronaVac booster n=41
ZF2001 booster n=81 Control n=42 |
|
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Intervention
1 IM booster dose of 3 mcg CoronaVac, 4-8 months after 2-dose CoronaVac schedule 1 IM booster dose of 25 mcg ZF2001, 4-8 months after 2-dose CoronaVac schedule |
|
Control
No booster 4-8 months after 2-dose CoronaVac schedule | |
Participants | |
Randomized 164 participants | |
Characteristics of participants Type of participants: Healthcare workers N=164 47 males Children: 0 Pregnant women: 0 Immunocompromized patients: 0 Mean age: Age range: NR | |
Description of participants Healthcare professionals with no previous confirmed COVID-19 at a single center in China who had received two doses of CoronaVac in a 28-day interval 4–8 months earlier | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register The incidence of effective immune reactivation on the 14th day of enrollment (Geometric mean titers (GMTs) of neutralizing antibodies produced in response to SARS-CoV-2 live virus increased 4 times or more from baseline, or changed from negative to positive from baseline) | |
In the report Seroconversion rate on day 14 after the third dose of neutralizing antibodies to authentic SARS-CoV-2, which was defined as a change of titers from seronegative at baseline to seropositive, or a four-fold increase of titers for individuals whose titers were above seropositive cutoffs (1:8). | |
Documents available |
Protocol NR Statistical plan * Data-sharing stated:
NR |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the registry and data supplement were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Neither protocol nor statistical analysis plan were available. The trial (n = 164) did not achieve its target sample size (n = 200). Only 2 arms (n=122) comparing CoronaVac booster dose (n=141) versus ZF2001 booster dose (n=181) were included in the analysis |