Trial RBR–9nn3scw
Publication Costa Clemens SA, Lancet, 2022
Dates: 2021-08-16 to 2021-09-01
Funding: Mixed (Ministério da Saúde - Brasil (Ministry of Health, Brazil); support from AstraZeneca for serological assays)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT | |
Location :
Multicenter / Brazil Follow-up duration (months): 1 | |
Ad26.COV2-S heterologous booster (n = 306)
BNT162b2 heterologous booster (n = 340) ChAdOx1 heterologous booster (n = 304) CoronaVac homologous booster (n = 290) |
|
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Intervention
1 IM booster dose of 5×10¹⁰ vp ChAdOx1, 152-210 days after primary CoronaVac schedule 1 IM booster dose of 30 mcg BNT162b2, 152-210 days after primary CoronaVac schedule 1 IM booster dose of 5×10¹⁰ vp AD26.COV2-S, 152-210 days after primary CoronaVac schedule |
|
Control
1 IM booster dose of 600 SU CoronaVac, 152-210 days after primary CoronaVac schedule | |
Participants | |
Randomized 1240 participants | |
Characteristics of participants Type of participants: Healthy adults N=1240 476 males Children: 0 Pregnant women: 0 Immunocompromized patients: 3 Mean age: Age range: 21-96 | |
Description of participants Healthy adults with no history of confirmed covid-19 who had previously received 2 doses of CoronaVac at two centers in Brazil | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Humoral immune response to a homologous or heterologous (3rd dose) booster regimen in individuals previously vaccinated with two doses of Sinovac/Butantan | |
In the report Non-inferiority of anti-spike IgG antibodies 28 days after the booster dose | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing stated:
Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the supplementary materials with study protcol, and prospective study registry were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The target sample size specified in the registry (n = 1200) was achieved (n = 1240). Pre-planned immunogenicity analyses for age subgroups and variants of concern were reported. The primary outcome in the report (non-inferiority of anti-spike IgG antibodies) did not fully reflect that in the registry (humoral immune response). |