Trial EudraCT021-002927-39
Publication Reindl-Schwaighofer R, JAMA, 2021
Funding: Public/non profit (Medical University of Vienna; Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety; Medical-Scientific Fund of the Mayor of the Federal Capital of Vienna; Christine Vranitzky-Stiftung Foundation; Medical University of Vienna Transplantation Research Platform )
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT | |
Location :
Single center / Austria Follow-up duration (months): 1.4 | |
2 doses mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 with homologous booster (n = 101)
2 doses mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 with Ad26COVS1 heterologous booster (n = 100) |
|
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Intervention
1 IM mRNA booster dose (BNT162b2 30 mcg or mRNA-1273 100 mcg), 8-13 weeks after 2-dose primary schedule of mRNA-based vaccine (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) |
|
Control
1 IM 5 × 10^10 vp booster dose of Ad26COV2.S, 8-13 weeks after 2-dose primary schedule of mRNA-based vaccine (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) | |
Participants | |
Randomized 201 participants | |
Characteristics of participants Type of participants: Kidney transplant recipients N=201 115 males Children: 0 Pregnant women: 0 Immunocompromized patients: 197 Mean age: Age range: NR | |
Description of participants Adult kidney transplant recipients with no history of COVID-19 infection and without an antibody response 4 weeks after a 2-dose mRNA vaccine schedule at a single center in Austria. | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Number of patients presenting a positive humoral immune response (antibody) at 4 weeks after vaccination | |
In the report seroconversion rate (ie, detectable SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies at a level >0.8 units [U]/mL) 4 weeks (29-42 days) following the third dose. | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing stated:
Yes, With publication |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the registry, protocol, statistical analysis plan and supplementary appendices were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. There were no important differences between protocol/registry and published report in population, procedures, or interventions. The study (n = 201) achieved its target sample size (n = 200). |