Trial RPCEC00000346
Publication Hernandez-Bernal , EClinicalMedicine, 2022
Dates: 2020-12-07 to 2021-02-09
Funding: Public/non profit (Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB), Havana (products, reagents); the Ministry of Public Health of Cuba (hospital facilities and general medical care of the participants).)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT | |
Location :
Single center / Cuba Follow-up duration (months): 1.87 | |
25 mcg CIGB-66 (RBD) Abdala (n = 242)
50 mcg CIGB-66 (RBD) Abdala (n = 242) Placebo (adjuvant) (n = 242) |
|
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Intervention
3 IM doses 25 mcg CIGB, each 14 days apart 3 IM doses 50 mcg CIGB, each 14 days apart |
|
Control
3 IM doses adjuvant placebo, each 14 days apart | |
Participants | |
Randomized 726 participants | |
Characteristics of participants Type of participants: Adults including elderly N=726 389 males Children: 0 Pregnant women: 0 Immunocompromized patients: 0 Mean age: Age range: 19-80 | |
Description of participants Adults 19 to 80 years old that were SARS-CoV-2 infection-free and with no recent contact or high-risk of exposure to COVID-19 at a single center in Cuba | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1) Adverse clinical events [at 24, 48 and 72 hours, and on the 7th day]; 2) Seroconversion of anti-RBD IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 [on days 28 and 42 (for the short scheme 0-14-28) and 28, 56 and 70 (for the long scheme 0-28-56)] | |
In the report Seroconversion day 56, define as at least a four-fold increase of antibody titers over baseline. | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing stated:
Yes, When the trial is complete, upon requests directed to the corresponding author and after approval of a proposal |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the published and pre-print articles, the prospective study registry was used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Neither protocol nor statistical analysis plan was available. The target sample size specified was achieved (n=726). There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control interventions. The primary outcomes reported in the article reflect those in the registry. Some reported outcomes were not planned in the registry (neutralizing antibody seroconversion and GMTs). Participants in the 3 short schedule arms (n=66) from phase 1 were combined with the participants enrolled in phase 2 (n=660).
This study has been updated on June 21st, 2022 after publication of the trial report. |