Note: The risk of bias by domain corresponds to the highest risk of bias among outcomes by domain.
The overall risk of bias corresponds to the overall highest risk of bias assessed among outcomes.
Bias | Author's judgement | Support for judgement |
Randomization |
Low |
Quote: “REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture, version 11.0.3) is a secure web application for building and managing online surveys and databases. And this database management platform generated the allocation sequence for recruited patients. The
randomization sequence was generated by validated software with blocks and verified by the
center.”
Comment: Allocation sequence random. Allocation sequence probably concealed. |
Deviations from intervention |
Some concerns |
Quote: “Open Label”
Comment: Unblinded study (participants and personnel/carers) Deviations from intended intervention arising because of the study context: No participant cross-over. No information on administration of co-interventions of interest: antivirals and corticosteroids. Biologics were the intervention. Hence, no information on whether deviations arose because of the trial context. Our analysis for the binary outcome is an intention-to-treat analysis. This method was considered appropriate to estimate the effect of assignment to intervention. Risk assessed to be some concerns for the outcomes: Mortality (D28). Clinical improvement (D28). Adverse events. |
Missing outcome data |
Low |
Comment: 60 participants randomized; 60 participants analyzed.
Data available for all or nearly all participants randomized. Risk assessed to be low for the outcomes: Mortality (D28). Clinical improvement (D28). Adverse events. |
Measurement of the outcome |
Some concerns |
Comment: Method of measuring the outcome probably appropriate.
Measurement or ascertainment of outcome probably does not differ between groups. Unblinded study (outcome assessor) MORTALITY Observer-reported outcome not involving judgement. Risk assessed to be low for the outcomes: Mortality (D28). CLINICAL IMPROVEMENT Clinical improvement (defined as an increase of two points on the WHO’s ordinal scale at day 28) requires clinical judgement and could be affected by knowledge of intervention receipt, but it not considered likely to in the context of a pandemic. Risk assessed to be some concerns for the outcomes: Clinical improvement (D28). ADVERSE EVENTS The authors reported on adverse events and serious adverse events that may contain both clinically- and laboratory-detected events, which can be influenced by knowledge of the intervention assignment, but is not likely in the context of the pandemic. Risk assessed to be some concerns for the outcomes: Adverse events. |
Selection of the reported results |
Some concerns |
Comment: The retrospective registry was available (dated January 26, 2021).
MORTALITY Mortality outcome was not pre-specified in the registry, however, we do not consider the reporting of this outcome to be selective since mortality should be reported even if not planned. Results were probably not selected from multiple outcome measurements or analyses of the data. Trial analyzed as pre-specified. Risk assessed to be low for the outcome: Mortality (D28). CLINICAL IMPROVEMENT. ADVERSE EVENTS No information on whether the result was selected from multiple outcome measurements or analyses of the data. No information on whether the trial was analyzed as pre-specified. Risk assessed to be some concerns for the outcome: Clinical improvement (D28). Adverse events. |
Overall risk of bias |
Some concerns |