Trial NCT04709835
Publication NCT04709835, Unpublished (2022) (results posted on registry)
Funding: Not reported/unclear
Conflict of interest: *
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: double blinding | |
Location :
Multicenter / Canada, Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Spain, UK Follow-up duration (days): 33 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
AT-527 550 mg 550 mg orally twice a day for 5 days AT-527 1100 mg 1100 mg orally twice a day for 5 days |
|
Control
Placebo | |
Participants | |
Randomized NR Analyzed 100 participants AT-527 550 mg=30 AT-527 1100 mg=30 Placebo=40 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 100 Mean age : NR 46 males Severity : Mild: n= */ Asymptomatic: n=0 Number of vaccinated participants: NR | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1. Change From Baseline in the Amount of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Virus RNA for AT-527 550 mg and Matched Placebo [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 3, Day 5, Day 7 ] SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA was measured by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs. The change from baseline was estimated from an ANCOVA model with baseline viral load as a covariate. Reported here is the adjusted mean change from baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. 2. Change From Baseline in the Amount of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Virus RNA for AT-527 1100 mg and Pooled Placebo [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 3, Day 5, Day 7 ] SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA was measured by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from NP swabs. The change from baseline was estimated from an ANCOVA model with baseline viral load as a covariate. Reported here is the adjusted mean change from baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. | |
In the report NR | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Not reported |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | This is an unpublished trial whose results have been reported in ClinicalTrials.gov. The trial registry, protocol and statistical analysis plan were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. The trial was registered prospectively and no important changes were made to primary or secondary outcomes after recruitment start. |