Trial NCT04387760
Publication AlQahtani M, Sci Rep (2022) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-08-01 to 2021-03-30
Funding: Public/non profit (National Taskforce for combating the Coronavirus (COVID- 19), Ministry of Health Bahrain; the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland-Bahrain.)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / Bahrain Follow-up duration (days): 30 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Favipiravir Initial dose: 1600 mg orally twice a day on day 1 - Maintenance dose: 600 mg orally twice a day on days 2 to 10 |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Favipiravir=54 Standard care=52 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 106 Mean age : NR 50 males Severity : Mild: n=104 / Moderate: n=1 / Severe: n=1 Critical: n=0 Number of vaccinated participants: NR | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Medial clinical scale at end of study follow up [Time Frame: Until discharge, death or for a maximum of 30 days or readmission] Median clinical scale at end of study follow up (day 14 or on discharge/death, whichever is earlier) | |
In the report The clinical scale at the end of study follow up (day 14 or on discharge/death, whichever is earlier) that was defined as 6 points: death; (5) points: hospitalization plus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or invasive mechanical ventilation; (4) points: hospitalization plus non-invasive ventilation or high-flow supplemental oxygen; (3) points: hospitalization plus supplemental oxygen (not high-flow or non-invasive ventilation); (2) points: hospitalization with no supplemental oxygen; (1) point: hospital discharge. | |
Documents available |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the trial registry was used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. Neither protocol nor statistical analysis plan was available. There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. The registry primary outcome reflects the reported primary outcome. Some outcomes from the registry are not reported in the paper (e.g., all adverse events- only discontinuations due to AEs were reported). This is a 3-arm trial incuding an HCQ group; only the Favipiravir vs Standard care comparison is relevant to our review and was extracted. |