Trial NCT04438980 ; EudraCT 2020-001827-15
Publication CORTIVID - Les I, Front Med (2022) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-05-08 to 2021-03-13
Funding: Public/non profit (ISCIII - Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Carlos III Health Institute)
)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: double blinding | |
Location :
Multicenter / Spain Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
IVMP Pulse 120 mg intravenously once a day for 3 days |
|
Control
Placebo | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : IVMP Pulse=34 Placebo=38 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 72 Mean age : NR 49 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=71 / Severe: n=0 Critical: n=0 Number of vaccinated participants: 0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Proportion of patients developing treatment failure [ Time Frame: At 14 days after randomization ] Death; Need for admission in an intensive care unit (ICU); Need for mechanical ventilation; Decrease in SpO2 <90% (in ambient air) or PaO2 <60 mmHg (in ambient air) or PaO2FiO2 <300 mmHg, associated with radiological impairment | |
In the report Treatment failure, defined as death, ICU admission, initiation of MV, or clinical worsening up to 14 days post-randomization. Clinical worsening was considered when at least one of the following two conditions was met: (1) SpO2 in ambient air below 90%, PaO2 in ambient air below 60 mmHg, or PaO2/FiO2 ratio below 300 mmHg; or (2) at least 15% decrease in the PaO2 from baseline, together with an increase in the levels of any inflammatory marker (CRP, IL-6, or ferritin) or radiological progression. | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the published article, the trial registries, protocol, statistical analysis plan and supplementary appendices were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. The primary and secondary outcomes in the article reflect those in the registries. The trial (n = 72) achieved its target sample size (n = 72).
This study was updated on August 4th, 2022 with data extracted after contact with authors. |