Trial NCT04546581
Publication ITAC (INSIGHT 013) - Polizzotto MN, Lancet (2022) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-10-08 to 2021-02-10
Funding: Mixed (US National Institutes of Health. Trial medications were donated by CSL Behring, Emergent BioSolutions, Grifols, Takeda, and Gilead Sciences. Many authors were employees of these companies.)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: triple blinding | |
Location :
Multicenter / Argentina, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Nigeria, Spain, UK, USA. Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
C-IVIG 400 mg/kg once-off, capped at 40 g. Commenced at rate of 0·5 mg/kg per min for 30 mins; if tolerated, doubled at 30 min intervals to maximum of 4 mg/kg per min. |
|
Control
Placebo | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Placebo=292 C-IVIG=301 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 593 Mean age : NR 336 males Severity : Mild: n=166 / Moderate: n=369 / Severe: n=58 Critical: n=0 Number of vaccinated participants: 3 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Ordinal Outcome Scale - Day 7 [ Time Frame: 7 days ] The primary objective is to compare the clinical status of patients in each group on day 7 of follow-up using the primary ordinal outcome with 7 mutually exclusive categories: 7. Death 6. End-organ failure 5. Life-threatening end-organ dysfunction 4. Serious end-organ dysfunction 3. Moderate end-organ dysfunction 2. Limiting symptoms due to COVID-19 1. No limiting symptoms due to COVID-19. Outcome is reported as the percent of participants in each of 7 categories. | |
In the report An ordinal outcome based on the patient's clinical status on day 7. The seven categories of this outcome ranged from return to usual activities with no more than minimal symptoms due to COVID-19, to death. Primary safety outcome was a composite of death, serious adverse events, and grade 3 or 4 adverse events up to day 7. | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the published article, the registry, protocol, statistical analysis plan and supplementary appendices were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. The primary outcome in the article reflects that in the registry. The study (n = 593) achieved its target sample size (n = 500).
This study was updated on September 28th, 2022 with data extracted from the registry (SAE results). |