Trial IRCT20190810044500N5
Publication Pourdowlat G, Phytother Res (2022) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-03-26 to 2020-09-30
Funding: Not reported/unclear
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: single blinding | |
Location :
Multicenter / Iran Follow-up duration (days): 14 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Colchicine Initial dose: 0.5 mg/day orally for up to 3 days -Maintenance dose: 1 mg/day orally for 12 days |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Colchicine=102 Standard care=100 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 202 Mean age : NR 93 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=* / Severe: n=* Critical: n=0 Number of vaccinated participants: 0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Clinical symptoms including fever, cough, shortness of breath. Timepoint: The first, third, seventh, fourteenth and 6-8 days after entering the study. Method of measurement: questionnaire. Laboratory symptoms (ESR, CRP, NLR, LDH, ferritin, D-dimer, CBC diff). Timepoint: Hospitalization time and discharge time. Method of measurement: Blood test. O2sat at the time of hospitalization and discharge. Timepoint: The first, third, seventh, fourteenth and 6-8 days after entering the study. Method of measurement: Pulse Oximeter. Pulmonary infiltration findings on CT scan. Timepoint: Two weeks later and 6-8 weeks later. Method of measurement: CT-scan. | |
In the report Clinical status distribution on chest CT evaluations | |
Documents available |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: N |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the retrospective study registry was used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The protocol and statistical analysis plan were not available. As the registry was retrospective we were unable to determine if the intervention, sample size and analysis plan were determined a-priori. The primary outcome for the paper was unclear, while the registry had four primary outcomes. Some outcomes from the registry are not reported in the paper (e.g., Mortality and Need hospitalization in ICU). |