Trial NCT04575597
Publication Jayk Bernal A, N Engl J Med (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2021-05-06 to 2021-10-02
Funding: Private (Merck Sharp and Dohme)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: double blinding | |
Location :
Multicenter / Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Egypt, France, Germany, Guatemala, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Philippines, Russian Federation, South Africa, Sp Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Molnupiravir 800 mg orally twice a day for 5 days |
|
Control
Placebo | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Molnupiravir=716 Placebo=717 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 1433 Mean age : NR 698 males Severity : Mild: n= 785/ Asymptomatic: n=0 Number of vaccinated participants: NR | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1) Percentage of participants who are hospitalized and/or die [ Time Frame: Up to 29 days ] Hospitalization (all cause) is ≥24 hours of acute care in a hospital or similar acute care facility. Death is due to any cause. 2) Percentage of participants with an adverse event (AE) [ Time Frame: Up to ~7 months ] An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. 3) Percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention due to an AE [ Time Frame: Up to 6 days ] An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. | |
In the report 1) the incidence of hospitalization for any cause (defined as ≥24 hours of acute care in a hospital or any similar facility) or death through day 29 2) the incidence of adverse events | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Low |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the trial registry, protocol, statistical analysis plan and supplementary appendices were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. The primary outcomes described in the article generally reflect those in the registry, with the omission of the percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention due to an AE. Recruitment was terminated on the basis of positive efficacy results from a planned interim analysis performed when 50% of target enrollment had been followed through day 29, and thus the study (n = 1433) did not achieve its target sample size (n = 1550). |