Trial NCT04330638; EudraCT2020-001500-41
Publication COV-AID - Declercq J, Lancet Respir Med (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-04-04 to 2020-12-06
Funding: Public/non profit (Belgian Health Care Knowledge Center; VIB Grand Challenges (Flemish Institute for Biotechnology))
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / Belgium Follow-up duration (days): 90 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Anakinra 100 mg once daily subcutaneously for 28 days or until hospital discharge Anakinra+Tocilizumab Anakinra 100 mg once daily subcutaneously for 28 days or until hospital discharge + Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV single dose (not exceeding 800 mg) Anakinra+Siltuximab Anakinra 100 mg once daily subcutaneously for 28 days or until hospital discharge + Siltuximab 11 mg/kg IV single dose Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV single dose (not exceeding 800 mg) Siltuximab 11 mg/kg IV single dose |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Anakinra =43 Anakinra+Tocilizumab=32 Anakinra+Siltuximab=37 Tocilizumab=82 Siltuximab=76 Standard care=72 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 342 Mean age : NR 90 males Severity : Mild: n=1 / Moderate: n=58 / Severe: n=39 Critical: n=17 Number of vaccinated participants: NR | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Time to Clinical Improvement [Time Frame: at day 15]: defined as the time from randomization to either an improvement of two points on a six-category ordinal scale or discharge from the hospital: a) Death; b) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; c) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; d) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; e) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; f) Not hospitalized. | |
In the report time to clinical improvement, defined as the time in days from randomisation until either an increase of at least two points on a 6-category ordinal scale (compared with the worst status at day of randomisation) or to discharge from the hospital alive, whichever occurred first. The 6-category ordinal scale was defined as 1=death; 2=hospitalised, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; 3=hospitalised, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 4=hospitalised, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5=hospitalised, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 6=not hospitalised. | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the published article, the study registry, supplementary material, protocol and statistical analysis plan were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group "Association Between Administration of IL-6 Antagonists and Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Meta-analysis." JAMA. 2021;326(6):499-518 was also available.
The study achieved the target sample size specified in the trial registry. There are no important changes from the trial registration in the primary outcome, procedures, intervention and control treatments. Total adverse events were not reported (but this had been pre-specified). 11% were critical at study start. Overall median age was 65 years (IQR 54–73) and 77% were male. Data presented for the outcomes mortality (D28), time to death, score 7 and above (D28), serious adverse events and clinical improvement (D28) (this last only for Tocilizumab and Siltuximab) were extracted from The WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group "Association Between Administration of IL-6 Antagonists and Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Meta-analysis." JAMA. 2021;326(6):499 518. The authors have been contacted in order to obtain the results. |