Trial NCT04350320 ; EUDRACT 2020-001511-2
Publication COL-COVID - Pascual-Figal DA, Int J Gen Med (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-04-30 to 2020-12-04
Funding: Public/non profit (1) “Cardiology Research group” at the IMIB-Arrixaca and the University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain; 2) Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain. Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC) is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) and Pro-CNIC Foundation.)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
* / Spain Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Colchicine Initial dose: 1.5 mg (1 mg and 0.5 mg two hours after) - first maintenance dose: 0.5 mg twice a day for 7 days - second maintenance dose: 0.5 mg once a day for 21 days. (Dose reduced by half in patients receiving ritonavir or lopinavir or with at least one of the following: reduced renal clearance (<50 mL/min/1.37m2), weight <70 kg or age >75 years old.) |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Standard care=51 Colchicine=52 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 103 Mean age : NR 54 males Severity : Mild: n=34 / Moderate: n=69 / Severe: n=0 Critical: n=0 Number of vaccinated participants: NR | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1) Changes in the patients' clinical status through the 7 points ordinal scale WHO R&D Blueprint expert group [ Time Frame: 7,14,28 Days ]; 2) Changes in IL-6 concentrations [ Time Frame: up to day 28. ] | |
In the report 1) Change in the WHO 7-points ordinal clinical scale during the 28 days of treatment; 2) effect on IL-6 levels, as main surrogated marker of inflammatory response | |
Documents available |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the trial registries and supplementary materials were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. Neither protocol not statistical analysis plan was available. The primary outcomes in the article reflected those in the registry. Some secondary outcomes in the registry were not reported in the article. There was no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. The study (n = 103) achieved its target sample size (n = 102). |