Trial NCT04577534
Publication COVIDSTORM - Broman N, Clin Microbiol Infect (2022) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-08-12 to 2021-06-16
Funding: No specific funding (No external funding was received
for this study or article.)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Single center / Finland Follow-up duration (days): 90 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Tocilizumab 400 mg for <60 kg, 600 mg for 60 to 90 kg, and 800 mg for >90 kg IV single dose |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Standard care=29 Tocilizumab=59 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 88 Mean age : NR 48 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=59 / Severe: n=20 Critical: n=1 Number of vaccinated participants: 0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Clinical status at day 28 [ Time Frame: day 28 ](assessed using 7-category ordinal scale) 7 death 6 in ICU with ECMO/ mechanical ventilation 5 in ICU, no ECMO/ mechanical ventilation 4 in hospital, not ICU, needs supplementary oxygen 3 in hospital, not ICU, no supplementary oxygen 2 not in hospital, but not back to normal 1 not in hospital, back to normal | |
In the report The primary endpoint was clinical status at day 28 assessed using a seven-category ordinal scale, where 1 is at home, normal daily activities; 2 is at home, assistance needed; 3 is hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen; 4 is hospitalized (non-ICU), receiving supplemental oxygen; 5 is in ICU, no invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV); 6 is in ICU receiving IMV and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; and 7 is dead. | |
Documents available |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Not reported |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
Data presented was originally extracted from study registry and The WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group "Association Between Administration of IL-6 Antagonists and Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Meta-analysis." JAMA. 2021;326(6):499–518.
On April 14, 2022, the extraction and risk of bias assessments were updated with information from the published article. There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. The registry primary outcome reflects the reported primary outcome. Of note: the outcomes Mortality (D60 or more) and Time to death were not reported in the 2022 publication and thus are the original extractions from The WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group "Association Between Administration of IL-6 Antagonists and Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Meta-analysis." JAMA. 2021;326(6):499–518. Furthermore, we extracted data reported as severe adverse events in the published report under our serious adverse events outcome. |