Trial ISRCTN21085622
Publication Abbass S, J Med Virol (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-09-01 to 2021-03-30
Funding: Private (Pharco Pharmaceuticals / European Egyptian Pharmaceutical Industries (EEPI))
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / Egypt Follow-up duration (days): 17 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Sofosbuvir-Daclatasvir SOF 400 mg once a day orally + DCV 60 mg once a day orally for 10 days SOF-RDV SOF 400 mg once a day orally + RDV 200 mg once a day orally for 10 days |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Sofosbuvir-Daclatasvir=40 SOF-RDV=40 Standard care=40 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 120 Mean age : NR 64 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=46 / Severe: n=74 Critical: n=0 Number of vaccinated participants: NR | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1. Sum of the counted symptoms (fever, headache, generalized aches (myalgia/arthralgia); respiratory distress combined with no evidence of deterioration (ICU admission and mechanical ventilation) at days3, 7 and 10; 2. Mean Oxygen saturation from day 1 to day 10 (based on daily recording as per CRF) | |
In the report 1. Sum of the counted symptoms (fever, headache, generalized aches [myalgia/arthralgia]; respiratory distress combined with no evidence of deterioration [ICU admission and mechanical ventilation]) at Days 7 and 10, controlling for the corresponding count of symptoms at Day 3 for each patient; 2. mean change in oxygen saturation from Day 1 to Day 10 (based on daily recording per CRF) | |
Documents available |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the study registry was used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Neither protocol nor statistical analysis plan was available. The primary and secondary outcomes reported in the article reflect those in the registry, which was retrospective. The study achieved the target sample size specified in the trial registry. |