Trial NCT04381936, EudraCT 2020-001113-21, ISRCTN5018967
Publication RECOVERY-REGEN - Horby P, Lancet (2022) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-09-18 to 2021-05-22
Funding: Mixed (UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council); National Institute of Health Research; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (REGEN-COV2 donation))
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / UK Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
REGN-COV2 8g (casirivimab 4g and imdevimab 4g) in 250ml 0.9% saline intravenously over 60 minutes +/- 15 minutes |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : REGN-COV2=4839 Standard care=4946 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 9785 Mean age : NR 6128 males Severity : Mild: n=641 / Moderate: n=5996 / Severe: n=2561 Critical: n=587 Number of vaccinated participants: 394 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register All-cause mortality [ Time Frame: Within 28 days after randomisation ] | |
In the report 28-day all-cause mortality | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
The RECOVERY trial is an investigator-initiated, individually randomized, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial to evaluate the effects of potential treatments in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. The trial is underway at 177 hospitals in the United Kingdom two hospitals in Indonesia, and two hospitals in Nepal. 127 UK hospitals took part in the evaluation of REGEN-COV. In addition to the published article, the pre-print article, protocol, statistical analysis plan, and prospective registries (NCT04381936 May 11 2020, EudraCT 2020-001113-21 March 19 2020, ISRCTN50189673 April 2 2020) were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. There were no substantive differences between the protocol and trial registries in population, procedures, interventions or outcomes. Information on the primary outcome was available for 99% of randomised patients for this preliminary analysis; patients who had not been followed for 28 days and were not known to have died by the time of the data cut (25 May 2021) were not included. No target sample size was pre-specified. On 27 April 2021, the trial steering committee, unaware of the results of the trial comparisons, determined that, with over 9700 patients recruited to the REGEN-COV comparison, further recruitment was unlikely to increase reliability of the results materially and recruitment was terminated.
The study was updated on the March 1st, 2022 with data from the published report. |