Trial ChiCTR2000029308
Publication Cao B, N Engl J Med (2020) (published paper)
Dates: 18jan2020 to 03feb2020
Funding: Mixed (Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development; Chinese Academyof Medical Sciences (CAMS) Emergency Project of Covid-19; National Science Grant for DistinguishedYoung Scholars.
Dr. Jaki is a recipient of)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Single center / China Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Lopinavir-Ritonavir LPV/r: 400mg and 100mg orally twice a day for 14 days. |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Lopinavir-Ritonavir=99 Standard care=100 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 199 Mean age : NR 120 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=0 / Severe: n=199 Critical: n=0 Number of vaccinated participants: NR | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Clinical improvement time of 28 days after randomization; The 7-point scale; 7 points: death; 6 points: admission to ECMO and / or mechanical ventilation; 5 points: Hospitalized for non-invasive ventilation and / or high-flow oxygen therapy 4 points: hospitalization for oxygen therapy 3 points: Hospitalization does not require oxygen therapy 2 points: discharged but not restored to normal functional status 1 point: discharged to normal function | |
In the report Time to clinical improvement, defined as the time from randomization to an improvement of two points (from the status at randomization) on a seven-category ordinal scale or live discharge from the hospital, whichever came first | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In language other than English Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to all available versions of the published/pre-print article, the study registry and protocol were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The protocol, which was available only in Chinese, was examined by native speakers. The study achieved the target sample size specified in the trial registry. There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. The primary outcome indicated in registry reflects the primary outcome reported in the paper. Some outcomes from the registry are not reported in the paper (e.g., proportion of patients in each category of the 7-point scale on day 28 after randomization). |