Trial NCT04394377
Publication ACTION - Lopes RD, Lancet (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-06-24 to 2021-02-26
Funding: Mixed (Coalition COVID-19 Brazil, Bayer SA.)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / Brazil Follow-up duration (days): 60 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Therap AC Clinically stable patients: PO rivaroxaban, 20 mg once daily (15 mg once daily if reduced creatinine clearance). Clinically unstable patients: SC enoxaparin 1 mg/kg twice per day, or IV unfractionated heparin at a dose to achieve anti-Xa concentration or partial thromboplastin time targets. Unfractionated heparin preferred option for patients with renal dysfunction or disseminated intravascular coagulation. Treatment to day 30. |
|
Control
Prophylactic AC Standard IV thromboembolism prophylaxis with enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin during hospitalisation and extended at the discretion of the treating physician. | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Therap AC=311 Prophylactic AC=304 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 615 Mean age : NR 368 males Severity : Mild: n=155 / Moderate: n=369 / Severe: n=53 Critical: n=38 Number of vaccinated participants: NR | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Hierarchical composite endpoint composed of mortality, number of days alive, number of days in the hospital and number of days with oxygen therapy at the end of 30 days. [ Time Frame: In 30 days ] | |
In the report Hierarchical composite of time to death, duration of hospitalisation, or duration of supplemental oxygen use through 30 days; Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the registry, published and unpublished protocols and statistical analysis plan, and supplementary appendices were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. The WHO 8-point ordinal scale (on which data extracted were based) was not in the registry or first version of the study protocol, but was added in an approved amendment to the protocol within 2 weeks of start of recruitment. There were no differences between the protocol and the published article in populations, procedures or interventions. The study achieved its pre-specified target sample size. |