Trial NCT04381936 ; ISRCTN50189673
Publication RECOVERY (COL) - Horby P, Lancet Respir Med (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-11-27 to 2021-03-04
Funding: Mixed (UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council); National Institute of Health Research; Wellcome Trust;. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; Health Data Research UK; Combiphar (drug donation))
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / UK, Indonesia, Nepal Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Colchicine Initial dose: 1 mg after randomization and 500 mcg 12 hours later - Maintenance dose: 500 mcg twice daily orally or by nasogastric tube for 10 days or until discharge. |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Standard care=5730 Colchicine=5610 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 11340 Mean age : NR 7909 males Severity : Mild: n=* / Moderate: n=* / Severe: n=3034 Critical: n=529 Number of vaccinated participants: NR | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register All-cause mortality [ Time Frame: Within 28 days after randomisation ] | |
In the report 28-day mortality | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication:
|
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the pre-print article, the trial registries, protocol and statistical analysis plan were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. There were no substantive differences between the pre-print article and the registry, protocol or statistical analysis plan on procedures, interventions or outcomes. Whereas in the trial registry (clinicaltrials.gov) colchicine was only allowed in women ≥55 years old, in the report only pregnant women were disallowed from the treatment. Recruitment was stopped on the advice of the independent data monitoring committee following a routine interim analysis that revealed there was no convincing evidence that further recruitment to the colchicine comparison would provide conclusive proof of worthwhile mortality benefit either overall or in any pre-specified subgroup. On October 20th, he extraction and risk of bias were updated with the information from the published article. |