Trial NCT04340557
Publication Geriak M, Infect Dis Ther (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-03-30 to 2020-07-04
Funding: Public/non profit ( Sharp Healthcare Foundation (San Diego, CA, USA))
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / USA Follow-up duration (days): 45 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Losartan 12.5 mg twice daily for up to 10 days. Dose could be escalated on judgement of treating physician. |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Losartan =17 Standard care=15 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 32 Mean age : NR 19 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=32 / Severe: n=0 Critical: n=0 Number of vaccinated participants: NR | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Mechanical ventilation [ Time Frame: from date of patient admission to date of patient discharge or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 45 days ] | |
In the report Receipt of mechanical ventilation or death before receiving ventilation (a composite of either receiving ventilation or the patient status changed to a do not resuscitate/do not intubate resulting in progressive respiratory failure and death). | |
Documents available |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
High |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the trial registry was used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. Neither protocol nor statistical analysis plan was available. The authors report in the published article that the trial “was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (March 27, 2020; NCT04340557), inferring prospective registration. Clinicaltrials.gov reports the registration was first submitted on April 6, 2020, a week after start of recruitment. There were no differences between the registry and published article in population, procedures or interventions. There were some differences in the outcomes reported (receipt of mechanical ventilation or death before receiving ventilation, discharge without progression to ICU, ICU transfer, in-hospital mortality and length of hospital stay) and those in the registry (number requiring transfer into ICU for mechanical ventilation, number transferred from non-ICU bed to an ICU bed, number of days requiring oxygen therapy). Adverse events were not reported except for discontinuation due to tolerability/safety. Mortality was reported as in-hospital mortality. The study did not achieve its estimated sample size (n = 200; n = 32 randomized) and appears to have been terminated: “study enrollment dropped off consider- ably because of a rise in competing clinical trials”. The study was assessed to be at a high risk of bias due to some concerns in four of five domains. |