Trial CTRI/2020/05/025369
Publication COVINTOC - Soin AS, Lancet Respir Med (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-05-30 to 2020-08-31
Funding: Mixed (Medanta Institute of Education and Research; Roche India; Cipla India; Action COVID-19 India)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / India Follow-up duration (days): 30 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Tocilizumab 6 mg/kg IV infusion, maximun 480 mg/day, a second infusion could be administered within 12 hours to 7 days after the first dose. |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Tocilizumab=90 Standard care=90 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 180 Mean age : NR 152 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=* / Severe: n=* Critical: n=9 Number of vaccinated participants: NR | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Proportion of subjects showing progressive COVID 19 disease from moderate to severe, or from severe disease to death (up to day 14) | |
In the report Proportion of patients with progression of COVID-19 from moderate to severe or from severe to death up to day 14 | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication:
|
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to all available version of the published article, the study registry and protocol were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. This is an unmasked study with no placebo. There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. Primary and secondary efficacy analyses were done in the modified intention-to-treat population (i.e. 179 patients), which included all randomly assigned patients who had at least one post-baseline assessment for the primary endpoint. Overall safety (mortality, adverse and serious adverse events) was assessed in all randomly assigned patients (i.e. 180 patients). Conversion to negative RT-PCR, stated as an outcome in the protocol and article, was not reported. |