Trial NCT04343768
Publication COVIFERON - Darazam IA, Scientific Reports (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-04-09 to 2020-04-30
Funding: No specific funding
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Single center / Iran Follow-up duration (days): 21 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Interferon beta-1a IFN beta 1a (Recigen) (Subcutaneous injections of 44mcg (12,000 IU) on days 1, 3, 6) Interferon beta-1b IFN beta 1b (Ziferon)(Subcutaneous injections of 0·25mg (8,000,000 IU) on days 1, 3, 6) |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Standard care=20 Interferon beta-1a=20 Interferon beta-1b=20 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 60 Mean age : NR 31 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=* / Severe: n=* Critical: n=0 Number of vaccinated participants: NR | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Time to clinical improvement [ Time Frame: From date of randomization until 14 days later. ] Improvement of two points on a seven-category ordinal scale (recommended by the World Health Organization: Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) R&D. Geneva: World Health Organization) or discharge from the hospital, whichever came first. | |
In the report Our primary outcome measure was TTCI [time to clinical improvement], defined as the time from enrollment to discharge from the hospital or a decline of two steps on the seven-step ordinal scale. (I) Not hospitalized, and has no activity limitations; (II) Not hospitalized, but has activity limitations; (III) Hospitalized, but does not need any supplemental oxygen; (IV) Hospitalized, and needs supplemental oxygen; (V) Hospitalized, and needs either High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) or non-invasive ventilation; (VI) Hospitalized, and needs invasive ventilation; and (VII) Dead | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the pre-print article, published protocol summary and prospective trial registry were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. There were some differences in outcomes and endpoints between the pre-print article, the published protocol summary and trial registry, although overall the study was reported as planned. The study achieved its pre-stated sample size. Altough the study is reported as 'open-label' it is stated that outcomce assessors were blinded to treatment arms.
On 20th of April, 2021, this study was updated based on the published report. |