Trial NCT04372186
Publication EMPACTA - Salama C, N Engl J Med (2020) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-05-14 to 2020-08-18
Funding: Private (Genentech, Inc.)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: double blinding | |
Location :
Multicenter / Brazil, Kenya, Mexico, Peru, South Africa, USA Follow-up duration (days): 60 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV single dose, maximum 800 mg, a second infusion could be administered 8 to 24 hours after the first one. |
|
Control
Placebo | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Tocilizumab=259 Placebo=129 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 388 Mean age : NR 223 males Severity : Mild: n=35 / Moderate: n=242 / Severe: n=100 Critical: n=0 Number of vaccinated participants: 0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Cumulative Proportion of Participants Requiring Mechanical Ventilation by Day 28 [ Time Frame: Up to Day 28 ] | |
In the report Mechanical ventilation (invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) or death by day 28 | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the published article, the pre-print article, study registry, protocol, statistical analysis plan and supplementary appendix were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The study achieved the target sample size specified in the trial registry. There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. The registry and protocol version 1 primary outcome (cumulative proportion of mechanical ventilation) does not reflect the primary outcome reported in the paper and and protocol version 2 (cumulative proportion of mechanical ventilation or death). Some secondary outcomes reported in the registry were not reported in the manuscript.
On December 21st,2020, we received additional information from authors on this study, we updated the study results based on authors reply. The study was updated on January 13th, 2021 with data from the New England Journal of Medicine publication. The definition for clinical improvement was 'at least a two-category improvement in clinical status relative to baseline on the seven-category ordinal scale (for patients in category 2 at baseline, those with a clinical status of category 1 were considered to have met the threshold)' and the data now corresponds to this definition. This study was update on May 27th, 2022 with results extracted from the registry. |