Trial RBR-949z6v
Publication Lemos ACB, Thromb Res (2020) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-04-01 to 2020-07-30
Funding: No specific funding (None)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Single center / Brazil Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Therap EX 1 mg/kg subcutaneously twice a day (maximum 140 mg twice a day) for 4-14 days |
|
Control
Prophylactic AC heparin: 5000 IU subcutaneously 3 times a day (if weight < 120 kg) and 7500 IU 3 times a day (if weight > 120 kg) OR enoxaparin: 40 mg once daily (if weight < 120 kg) and 40 mg twice daily (if weight > 120 Kg) according to the doctor's judgment. | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Therap EX=10 Prophylactic AC=10 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 20 Mean age : NR 16 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=0 / Severe: n=0 Critical: n=20 Number of vaccinated participants: NR | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Evaluation of gas exchange between D0 / D4 /D7 /D14 evaluated through the PO2 / FIO2 ratio; days without mechanical ventilation (within 28 days of follow-up, how many days were out of mechanical ventilation, if the patient dies before 28 days of foll | |
In the report Variation in gas exchange over time evaluated through the ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) at baseline, 7, and 14 days after randomization | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In language other than English Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication:
|
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published study report, the protocol (available in Portuguese) and trial registry were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. The study differed from its original protocol in that there are only two arms in the reported trial whereas three were intended, but the authors are transparent about this, stating the reason for the abandonment of the third arm. The reported study achieved the sample size proposed in the protocol. Whereas the protocol stated that Enoxaparin may be extended up to 7-10 days at the discretion of the medical team, the published article reports maintaining treatment for up to 14 days. There were no substantive differences in outcomes between the registry or protocol and the published study report. |