Trial NCT04321278
Publication Furtado RHM, Lancet (2020) (published paper)
Dates: 28/03/2020 to 19/05/2020
Funding: Mixed (COALITION COVID-19 Brazil; EMS)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / Brazil Follow-up duration (days): 29 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
HCQ+AZM Azithromycin: 500 mg orally, by nasogastric tube or IV once a day for 10 days. Hydroxychloroquine: 400 mg orally or by nasogastric tube twice a day for 10 days |
|
Control
Hydroxychloroquine 400 mg orally or by nasogastric tube twice a day for 10 days | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : HCQ+AZM=237 Hydroxychloroquine=210 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 447 Mean age : NR 286 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=* / Severe: n=* Critical: n=225 Number of vaccinated participants: NR | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Evaluation of the clinical status [ Time Frame: 15 days after randomization ] | |
In the report Clinical status, measured at 15 days using a six-level ordinal scale | |
Documents available |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Not reported |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to all available versions of the published article, the study registry. statistical analysis plan and protocol were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The study was terminated early due faster than anticipated enrolment. The study achieved the target sample size specified in the registry. There was no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments nor the primary and secondary outcomes.
The extraction and assessment were in accordance with the original statistical analysis plan using the intention-to-treat population (retrieved from the Supplementary Appendix) vs. the modified intention-to-treat population reported in the paper. Quote: "As of May 13, 2020, the protocol was amended so that the main analysis would be done in a modified ITT (mITT) population that included only patients diagnosed with COVID-19 confirmed through molecular methods or serological testing. This decision was made by the executive committee before the first interim analysis from the data safety monitoring board while masked to study results. The reason for this decision was to include in the primary analysis only those patients more likely to benefit from the study intervention, (ie, those ones with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection)." |