Trial IRCT20200408046987N1
Publication Niaee MS, Asian Pac J Trop Med, 2021 (published paper)
Funding: Mixed (Qazvin University of Medical Sciences and Science (pre-print); Chistasazan Notash Fartak Company Limited (registry))
Conflict of interest: *
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: double blinding | |
Location :
Multicenter / Iran Follow-up duration (days): * | |
Inclusion criteria | Age >18 years;
Signed the informed consent; Clinical symptoms of suggestive of COVID-19 pneumonia: cough (with or without sputum), fever, pleuritic chest pain or dyspnea; Mild to severe COVID-19 disease confirmed by chest computed tomography (CT) scan findings compatible with COVID-19 or positive real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). |
Exclusion criteria | Presence of severe immunosuppression (e.g., use of immune-suppressants and HIV positive);
Pregnant women; Chronic kidney disease; Malignancy; Indications that the patients were unable and/or unlikely to comprehend and/or follow the protocol. |
Interventions | |
Treatment 1 Ivermectin Once-off (200 mcg/kg) Co-Intervention: Standard care Duration : 1 day | |
Control Standard care | |
Control Placebo | |
Treatment 4 Ivermectin 3-day LD (200 mcg/kg) Co-Intervention: Standard care Duration : 5 days | |
Treatment 5 Ivermectin 1-day BDS (200 mcg/kg) Co-Intervention: Standard care Duration : 1 day | |
Treatment 6 Ivermectin 3-day HD (200 mcg/kg) Co-Intervention: Standard care Duration : 5 days | |
Participants | |
Randomized 180 participants n1=30/ n2=30/ n3=30/ n4=30/ n5=30/ n6=30/ | |
Characteristics of participants N=180 Mean age : NR 90 males Severity : Mild: n=* / Moderate: n=*/ Severe: n=* Critical: n=* | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Chest image (CT scan) at hospital clearance; Hospitalization time; CBC and CRP | |
In the report The primary endpoint of this trial was all-cause of mortalityor clinical recovery. Clinical recovery was defined as normaltemperature, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation (>94%)without oxygen therapy sustained for 24 h. | |
Documents available |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing stated Unclear |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published and pre-print articles, the trial registry was used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. Neither study protocol nor statistical analysis plan was available. There were some differences between the registry and the pre-print article in terms of inclusion criteria, number of treatment arms, and outcomes (registry: chest CT scan, length of hospitalization, complete blood count, C-reactive protein; article: clinical recovery defined as normal fever, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation >94% without oxygen therapy sustained for 24h). Mortality was not listed as an outcome in the registry. The study achieved its pre-stated sample size. The overall follow-up of the study is unclear. |