Study Samaha A, Viruses 2021 has been retracted on October 26, 2021. The study was excluded from the analysis and grade assessment by December 17 the latest.
Study Pott-Junior H, 2021 (Toxicology Reports) retracted on May 11, 2022. FOREST PLOTS -2023-01-27
Trial NCT04403555
Publication Abd-Elsalam S, J Med Virol (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-03-01 to 2020-10-30
Funding: Not reported/unclear
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / Egypt Follow-up duration (days): 30 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Ivermectin 12 mg per day orally for 3 days |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Ivermectin=82 Standard care=82 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 164 Mean age : NR 82 males Severity : Mild: n=* / Moderate: n=* / Severe: n=* Critical: n=* | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register The number of patients with resolved viral infection [Time Frame: 6 months] (2020-05-23) The number of patients with mortality [Time Frame: 1 month] (2021-03-03) | |
In the report All-cause mortality within 1 month after randomization | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Not reported |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the trial registry was used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Neither protocol not statistical analysis plan was available. The trial was first registered during the conduct of the study. There were substantial changes to methods during and after the conduct of the study from the initial trial registration to the final registration and report. The sample size was reduced. Intervention and control treatments changed from ivermectin with doxycycline compared with chloroquine to ivermectin compared with standard care. The ivermectin dosage was changed. The primary outcome changed from resolved viral infection to mortality, and additional outcomes were added after the study had been completed. |
Trial NCT04407130
Publication Ahmed S, Int J Infect Dis (2020) (published paper)
Funding: Private (Beximco Pharmaceutical Limited, Bangladesh)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: double blinding | |
Location :
* / Bangladesh Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
IVM+DX Ivermectin : 12mg once-off orally. Doxycycline : 200mg orally at day-1 followed by 100mg twice a day for next 4 days Ivermectin 12mg once a day orally for 5 days |
|
Control
Placebo | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : IVM+DX=24 Ivermectin=24 Placebo=24 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 72 Mean age : NR 33 males Severity : Mild: n=72 / Moderate: n=0 / Severe: n=0 Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1.Virological clearance [ Time Frame: within 7 days after enrollment ] 2.Remission of fever [ Time Frame: within 7 days after enrollment ] 3.Remission of cough [ Time Frame: within 7 days after enrollment ] | |
In the report Time required for virological clearance (a negative rRT-PCR result on nasopharyngeal swab); remission of fever (≥37.5C) and cough within 7 days | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Not reported |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
The published article and the regsitry were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. No study protocol or statistical analysis plan were available. 4/72 participants withdrew consent because of family obligations and unwillingness to be tested further. Baseline characteristics were not reported by study group. Some efficacy outcomes were not reported in the results section of the paper although they were listed in the methods section. Mortality, reported as a study outcome in the methods, was not clearly reported.
This study was updated on February 2nd, 2021 after contact with authors. |
Trial NCT04391127
Publication Beltran-Gonzalez J, medRxiv (2021) (preprint)
Dates: 2020-05-04 to 2020-08-15
Funding: Public/non profit (Aguascalienes State Health Institute)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Double blinded, no restrictions | |
Location :
Single center / Mexico Follow-up duration (days): 30 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Hydroxychloroquine Initial dose: 400 mg orally twice a day for the first day. Maintenance dose: 200 mg orally twice a day for another 4 days. Ivermectin 12 mg for one day in patients weighing < 80 kg and 18 mg for one day in those >80 kg. |
|
Control
Placebo Two calcium citrate tablets orally twice a day for one day. Subsequently one tablet twice a day for 4 more days. | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Hydroxychloroquine=33 Ivermectin=36 Placebo=37 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 106 Mean age : NR 66 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=16 / Severe: n=90 Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Mean days of hospital stay [ Time Frame: Three months ]; Rate of Respiratory deterioration, requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation or dead [ Time Frame: Three months ]; Mean of oxygenation index delta [ Time Frame: Three months ] | |
In the report Hospitalization duration until discharge due to clinical improvement, the total duration of hospitalization, and the safety outcomes were duration of hospitalization until respiratory deterioration (previously defined) or death | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the pre-print article, the trial registry was used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. Neither study protocol nor statistical analysis plan was available. Inclusion criteria in registry and the pre-print article differ slightly in that the pre-print article also included hypoxemic respiratory failure or acute clinical deterioration of pre-existing lung or heart disease. Some pre-stated primary (i.e., mean of oxygenation index delta) and secondary (i.e., mean time to negative PCR) outcomes were not reported. There were no substantive differences between the pre-print article and the trial registry in interventions. Patients considered at high risk of development of QT interval prolongation due to hydroxychloroquine were only randomized to the ivermectin or placebo arms. The trial was terminated due to a reduction in eligible participants. As a result, the target sample size was not achieved.
This trial was updated on July 28th, 2021 with data gained from contact with authors. |
Trial *
Publication Kishoria N, PIJR (2020) (published paper)
Funding: Not reported/unclear
Conflict of interest: *
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Single center / India Follow-up duration (days): 6 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Ivermectin 12 mg single dose |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Ivermectin=19 Standard care=13 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 32 Mean age : NR 23 males Severity : Mild: n=32 / Moderate: n=0 / Severe: n=0 Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register NR | |
In the report Negative throat swab report for SARS-CoV-2 conducted by RT-PCR after 48 hours of day one of research therapy. However if patient was tested positive on the then the test was repeated again after 48 hours. | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Not reported |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | Only the published article was used in data extraction and assessment of the risk of bias. No trial registry, study protocol or statistical analysis plan was available. The sample included in this hospital-based study was small due to change in guidelines during the study in which asymptomatic patients and patients with mild symptoms were recommended to be home isolated and not hospitalized. Safety outcomes such as adverse events or death are not reported. |
Trial NCT04381884
Publication Krolewiecki A, EClinicalMedicine (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-05-18 to 2020-09-09
Funding: Mixed (Agencia Nacional de Promocion de la Investigacion, el Desarrollo Tecnologico y la Innovacion, Argentina and Laboratorio ELEA/Phoenix, Argentina)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Outcome assessor | |
Location :
Multicenter / Argentina Follow-up duration (days): 30 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Ivermectin 0.6 mg/kg orally once a day for 5 days. |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Ivermectin=30 Standard care=15 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 45 Mean age : NR 25 males Severity : Mild: n=42 / Moderate: n=3 / Severe: n=0 Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Reduction in SARS-CoV-2 viral load [ Time Frame: 1 - 5 days ] | |
In the report Difference in SARS-CoV-2 viral load between baseline and day-5 | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the published/pre-print article, the trial registry was used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. Neither study protocol nor statistical analysis plan was available. There were no substantive differences between the published article and the trial registry in study procedures, population, treatments or outcomes. The study achieved its pre-stated sample size. No information is provided on what is included in standard care. There is little information on what adverse events were experienced.
On July 7th, 2021, this study was updated based on the published report. On October 6th, 2021, the study was updated based on the corrigendum. |
Trial NCT04920942
Publication I-TECH - Lim SCL, JAMA Intern Med (2022) (published paper)
Dates: 2021-05-31 to 2021-10-09
Funding: Not reported/unclear
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / Malaysia Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Ivermectin 0.4 mg/kg/day orally for 5 days |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Ivermectin=250 Standard care=250 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 500 Mean age : NR 223 males Severity : Mild: n=490 / Moderate: n=0 / Severe: n=0 Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1) Number of Patients who Progressed to Severe Disease (Clinical stage 4 or 5) [ Time Frame: Within 28 days since administered Ivermectin ]; 2) Time Required for Patients on Treatment Arm to Progressed to Severe Disease (Clinical stage 4 or 5) [ Time Frame: Within 28 days since administered Ivermectin ] | |
In the report The proportion of patients who progressed to severe COVID-19, defined as the hypoxic stage requiring supplemental oxygen to maintain Spo2 95% or greater (Malaysian COVID-19 clinical severity stages 4 or 5; WHO clinical progression scale 5-9) | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the trial registry, protocol, statistical analysis plan and supplementary appendices were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. The primary and secondary outcomes in the article reflect those in the registry and/or protocol. The study (n = 500) achieved its target sample size (n = 500). There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. |
Trial *
Publication Manomaipiboon A, Research square (2022) (preprint)
Dates: 2021-09-01 to 2021-11-30
Funding: Public/non profit (Navamindradhiraj University)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: double blinding | |
Location :
Single center / Thailand Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Ivermectin 12 mg/day orally for 5 days |
|
Control
Placebo | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Ivermectin=37 Placebo=37 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 74 Mean age : NR 27 males Severity : Mild: n=* / Moderate: n=* / Severe: n=0 Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register NR | |
In the report Viral clearance of SARS-CoV-2 on day 7 and 14 after intervention | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | Only the pre-print article was used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. No registry was available and the protocol referred to as a supplementary file in the article was not available. Therefore, it is not clear whether population, intervention and outcomes were prespecified or whether there was a target sample size. |
Trial CTRI/2020/06/026001
Publication RIVET-COV - Mohan A, J Infect Chemother (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-07-28 to 2020-09-29
Funding: Mixed (Department of Science and Technology, Government of India; WindLas BioTech Ltd. Haryana (drug contribution))
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Participants, outcome assessor and health care pro | |
Location :
Single center / India Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Ivermectin 12 mg 12 mg orally, single dose Ivermectin 24 mg 24 mg orally, single dose Ivermectin 12 mg orally, single dose |
|
Control
Placebo | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Ivermectin 12 mg=52 Ivermectin 24 mg=52 Placebo=53 Ivermectin=104 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 261 Mean age : NR 146 males Severity : Mild: n=150 / Moderate: n=15 / Severe: n=0 Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Frequency of RT-PCR negativity at day 5 after drug administration; Change in viral load (as determined by RTPCR cycle threshold) at day 5 as compared to baseline | |
In the report Reduction of viral load and conversion to negativity of nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal RT-PCR on day 5 after intervention | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Not reported |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the journal and pre-print article, the study registry and supplementary materials were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. It is not clear what the target sample size was and if it was achieved. Outcomes were not reported in the study registry, so it is unclear if there were reported at the correct follow-up point. There is no change from the study registration in the intervention and control treatments.
This trial was updated on September 27th, 2021 with data from the peer-reviewed journal publication. |
Trial IRCT20200408046987N1
Publication Niaee MS, Asian Pac J Trop Med (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-06-01 to 2020-07-15
Funding: Mixed (Qazvin University of Medical Sciences and Science (publication); Chistasazan Notash Fartak Company Limited (registry))
Conflict of interest: *
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: | |
Location :
Multicenter / Iran Follow-up duration (days): 45 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
SC/Placebo 200 mcg/kg orally once off. Ivermectin 200 mcg/kg orally once off. |
|
Control
Placebo/NA Standard care/NA | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Placebo/NA=30 Standard care/NA=30 SC/Placebo=60 Ivermectin=120 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 240 Mean age : NR 54 males Severity : Mild: n=* / Moderate: n=* / Severe: n=* Critical: n=* | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Chest image (CT scan) at hospital clearance; Hospitalization time; CBC and CRP | |
In the report The primary endpoint of this trial was all-cause of mortality or clinical recovery. Clinical recovery was defined as normal temperature, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation (>94%) without oxygen therapy sustained for 24 h. | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication:
|
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published/pre-print article, the trial registry was used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. Neither study protocol nor statistical analysis plan was available. There were some differences between the registry and the published/pre-print article in terms of inclusion criteria, number of treatment arms, and outcomes (registry: chest CT scan, length of hospitalization, complete blood count, C-reactive protein; article: clinical recovery defined as normal fever, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation >94% without oxygen therapy sustained for 24h). Mortality was not listed as an outcome in the registry. The study achieved its pre-stated sample size. The overall follow-up of the study is unclear. |
Trial NCT04646109
Publication Okumus N, BMC Infectious Disea (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-05-11 to 2020-09-02
Funding: Public/non profit (Afyonkarahisar Health Science University)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Single blinded, no restrictions | |
Location :
Multicenter / Turkey Follow-up duration (days): 90 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Ivermectin 200 mcg/kg enterally once daily for 5 days. 9 mg between 36–50 kg, 12mg between 51–65 kg, 15mg between 66–79 kg and 200 mcg/kg in > 80 kg |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Ivermectin=36 Standard care=30 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 66 Mean age : NR 40 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=0 / Severe: n=58 Critical: n=2 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1. Gender Distribution of the Patients [ Time Frame: At the first day of the study ] 2. Age Distribution of the Patients [ Time Frame: At the first day of the study] 3. Percentage of Patients With Accompanying Diseases [ Time Frame: At the first day of the study] 4. Percentage of Patients With Baseline Clinical Symptoms [ Time Frame: At the first day of the study ] 5. Body Temperature Means of the Patients [ Time Frame: At the first day of the study] 6. Heart Rate Means of the Patients [ Time Frame: At the first day of the study] 7. Respiratory Rate Means of the Patients [ Time Frame: At the first day of the study] 8. Systolic and Diastolic Pressure Means of the Patients [ Time Frame: At the first day of the study] 9. Number of Participants With Clinical Response [ Time Frame: From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)] 10. Changes in Oxygen Saturation (Sp02) Values [ Time Frame: From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)] 11. Changes in the Ratio of Partial Pressure of Oxygen (Pa02) to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (Fi02) (Pa02/Fi02) [ Time Frame: From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day) ] 12. Changes in Serum Lymphocyte Counts [ Time Frame: From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)] 13. Changes in the Ratio of Polymorphonuclear Leukocyte Count to Lymphocyte Count (PNUL) [ Time Frame: From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day) ] 14. Changes in Serum Ferritin Levels [ Time Frame: From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)] 15. Changes in Serum D-dimer Levels [ Time Frame: From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day) ] 16. Genetic Examination of Haplotypes and Mutations That Cause Function Losing for Ivermectin Metabolism [ Time Frame: At the first day of ivermectin therapy (1st day)] 17. Treatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0 [ Time Frame: At the first 5 days of study] | |
In the report Clinical responses and drug side effects obtained in patients on the 5th day | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
High |
General comment | In addition to the pre-print and published article, the study registry (including outcome data) and protocol were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The study was registered retrospectively but the protocol was dated prospectively. The trial used a quasi-randomized design. This study was updated on April 07th, 2021, with data from the study registry. On 12th of May, 2021, this study was updated based on the published report. |
Trial CTRI/2020/08/027225
Publication Ravikirti R, J Pharm Pharm Sci (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-08-28 to 2020-10-31
Funding: Mixed (All India Institute of Medical Sciences; Sun Pharma Pvt. Ltd. (placebo provision); learning resource allowance of the principal investigator (ivermectin procurement))
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: double blinding | |
Location :
Single center / India Follow-up duration (days): * | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Ivermectin 12 mg enterally once daily on days 1 and 2 |
|
Control
Placebo | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Placebo=58 Ivermectin=57 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 115 Mean age : NR 81 males Severity : Mild: n=* / Moderate: n=* / Severe: n=* Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Negative RT-PCR [Day 6] | |
In the report Negative RT-PCR report on day 6 | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
High |
General comment | In addition to the published/pre-print article, the trial registry was used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. Neither the protocol nor statistical analysis plan were available. There were no substantive differences between the article and the trial registry in population, procedures, or interventions. The study achieved its pre-stated sample size. Although negative conversion by RT-PCR was reported as an outcome, it is unclear what proportion of patients was positive by the same measure at baseline: inclusion criteria included diagnosis confirmed by RT-PCR or Rapid Antigen Test. Some outcomes were reported with no details of duration of follow-up (admission to ICU, invasive ventilation, in-hospital mortality). Two secondary outcomes reported (symptom free on day 6 and later discharge) and drug-related adverse events were not included in the registry |
Trial NCT04392713
Publication Shah Bukhari K H, medRxiv (2021) (preprint)
Funding: Not reported/unclear ("Not applicable")
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Single center / Pakistan Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Ivermectin 12 mg, once-off dose on admission |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Ivermectin=50 Standard care=50 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 100 Mean age : NR 73 males Severity : Mild: n=100 / Moderate: n=0 / Severe: n=0 Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Negative PCR [ Time Frame: 144 hours ] - PCR will be done at 48, 96 and 144 hours | |
In the report The primary end-point of the study was viral clearance and was measured as the days to achieve RT-PCR negativity following ivermectin administration. | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Not reported |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
High |
General comment | In addition to the pre-print article, the trial registry was used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. The trial was registered retrospectively while the trial was ongoing. Neither study protocol nor statistical analysis plan was available. There are some differences between the pre-print article and the trial protocol in exclusion criteria relating to comorbidities. Standard care was different between the registry (chloroquine) and the report (vitamin C, paracetamol). The primary outcome timepoints differ between the registry and the pre-print article. The secondary outcome in the registry (need for ventilation) was not reported in the pre-print article. The pre-print reported that there were no adverse drug reactions in the ivermectin arm (not listed as an outcome in the registry). The target sample size specified in the registry was achieved. The study was assessed to be at a high risk of bias due to some concerns in multiple domains. |
Trial IRCT20111224008507N3
Publication Shahbaznejad L, Clin Ther (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-05-23 to 2020-07-31
Funding: No specific funding (Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Participants and outcome assessor | |
Location :
Multicenter / Iran Follow-up duration (days): 7 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Ivermectin 0.2 mg/kg orally once-off (weight-based doses, i.e. 15-24 kg: 3 mg; 25-30 kg: 6 mg; 36-50 kg: 9 mg; 51-80 kg: 12 mg; >80 kg: 0.2 mg/kg). |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Ivermectin=35 Standard care=38 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 73 Mean age : NR 36 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=* / Severe: n=* Critical: n=3 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Clinical symptoms including fever, chills, sore throat, cough, shortness of breath, decreased appetite, abdominal pain, dizziness, insomnia, itching, joint pain, joint swelling, headache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malaise, conjunctivitis, tachycardia, wheezing, rhonchus, retraction, hypotension, rash, other symptoms; respiratory rate and O2 saturation-The first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh day. | |
In the report Clinical improvement after baseline defined as resolving patients’ baseline status on persistent and continuous cough (coughing a lot for more than an hour, or ≥3 coughing episodes in 24 hours that interferes with daily life and ability to work) and tachypnea in addition to increasing oxygen saturation >94%. | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published report (pre-proof), the retrospective registry was used in data extraction and assessment of the risk of bias. The protocol or statistical analysis plan was not available. The study achieved the target sample size specified in the trial registry (n=60). There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. After selecting the samples, none of the participants was aware of randomization and allocation to groups. The evaluator nurse of data recording is from out of the study and questionnaires was provided in the form of coding to him/her. So, the present study is double-blinded (registry). Some outcomes from the report are not mentioned in the registry (e.g. adverse events, mortality). |