On Jan 26th, 2022, we published results of the Interleukin‐1 blocking agents for treating COVID‐19 which included all preprints and published trials published online up to November 5, 2021.
FOREST PLOTS -2022-10-07
Trial NCT04324021
Publication Andersson H, Unpublished (2022) (results posted on registry)
Funding: Private (Swedish Orphan Biovitrum)
Conflict of interest: *
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / USA, Italy Follow-up duration (days): 70 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Emapalumab Initial dose: 6 mg/kg IV infusion on day 1. Maintenance dose: 3 mg/kg IV infusion every 3rd day on days 4, 7, 10, 13. Anakinra 100 mg IV infusion 4 times daily for 15 days |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Emapalumab=5 Anakinra=5 Standard care=6 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 16 Mean age : NR 14 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=0 / Severe: n=16 Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Number of Participants With Treatment Success [ Time Frame: Up to Day 15 ] Defined as the number of patients not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) | |
In the report NR | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Not reported |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
This is an unpublished trial whose results have been reported in ClinicalTrials.gov. The trial registry, protocol and statistical analysis plan were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. The trial was registered prospectively and no important changes were made to primary or secondary outcomes after recruitment start. The trial (n = 16) did not achieve its target sample size (n = 52) and is underpowered to assess statistical significance between the treatment and placebo group. The trial was terminated
Quote: "Standard of care evolved during the timeframe of the study and had critical impact on recruitment. Early termination was not based on safety reasons but due to the reasons mentioned above. The ongoing patients were completed." |
Trial NCT04364009
Publication ANACONDA - Audemard-Verger A, Plos One (2022) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-04-27 to 2020-10-06
Funding: Public/non profit (Tours university hospital)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / France Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Anakinra Initial dose: 400mg/day (100mg IV every 6 hours) by IV for 3 days - Maintenance dose: 200mg/day (100mg every 12 hours) by IV for 7 days. In case of renal failure (eGFR<30ml/min), anakinra was administrated 1 day out 2. |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Anakinra=37 Standard care=34 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 71 Mean age : NR 52 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=* / Severe: n=* Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Treatment success [ Time Frame: After 14 days of treatment ] The primary endpoint is treatment success at Day 14, defined as a patient alive and not requiring any of the following: Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) | |
In the report Treatment success at day 14, defined as a patient being alive and not requiring either of the following: invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: N |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the registry, protocol, and statistical analysis plan were available for data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The trial was terminated because of safety concerns therefore the study (n=71) did not achieve the target sample size (n=240).There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. The primary outcome indicated in registry reflects the primary outcome reported in the paper. |
Trial NCT04330638; EudraCT2020-001500-41
Publication COV-AID - Declercq J, Lancet Respir Med (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-04-04 to 2020-12-06
Funding: Public/non profit (Belgian Health Care Knowledge Center; VIB Grand Challenges (Flemish Institute for Biotechnology))
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / Belgium Follow-up duration (days): 90 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Anakinra 100 mg once daily subcutaneously for 28 days or until hospital discharge Anakinra+Tocilizumab Anakinra 100 mg once daily subcutaneously for 28 days or until hospital discharge + Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV single dose (not exceeding 800 mg) Anakinra+Siltuximab Anakinra 100 mg once daily subcutaneously for 28 days or until hospital discharge + Siltuximab 11 mg/kg IV single dose Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV single dose (not exceeding 800 mg) Siltuximab 11 mg/kg IV single dose |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Anakinra =43 Anakinra+Tocilizumab=32 Anakinra+Siltuximab=37 Tocilizumab=82 Siltuximab=76 Standard care=72 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 342 Mean age : NR 90 males Severity : Mild: n=1 / Moderate: n=58 / Severe: n=39 Critical: n=17 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Time to Clinical Improvement [Time Frame: at day 15]: defined as the time from randomization to either an improvement of two points on a six-category ordinal scale or discharge from the hospital: a) Death; b) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; c) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; d) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; e) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; f) Not hospitalized. | |
In the report time to clinical improvement, defined as the time in days from randomisation until either an increase of at least two points on a 6-category ordinal scale (compared with the worst status at day of randomisation) or to discharge from the hospital alive, whichever occurred first. The 6-category ordinal scale was defined as 1=death; 2=hospitalised, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; 3=hospitalised, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices; 4=hospitalised, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5=hospitalised, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 6=not hospitalised. | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the published article, the study registry, supplementary material, protocol and statistical analysis plan were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group "Association Between Administration of IL-6 Antagonists and Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Meta-analysis." JAMA. 2021;326(6):499-518 was also available.
The study achieved the target sample size specified in the trial registry. There are no important changes from the trial registration in the primary outcome, procedures, intervention and control treatments. Total adverse events were not reported (but this had been pre-specified). 11% were critical at study start. Overall median age was 65 years (IQR 54–73) and 77% were male. Data presented for the outcomes mortality (D28), time to death, score 7 and above (D28), serious adverse events and clinical improvement (D28) (this last only for Tocilizumab and Siltuximab) were extracted from The WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group "Association Between Administration of IL-6 Antagonists and Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Meta-analysis." JAMA. 2021;326(6):499 518. The authors have been contacted in order to obtain the results. |
Trial NCT02735707
Publication REMAP-CAP - Derde L, medRxiv (2021) (preprint)
Dates: 2020-03-25 to 2021-04-10
Funding: Mixed (PREPARE consortium by the European Union; FP7-HEALTH-2013-INNOVATION-1; RECOVER consortium by the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program; Australian National Health and Medical Research Council; Health Research Council of New Zealand; Canadian Institute of Health Research Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Innovative Clinical Trials Program Grant; UK NIHR; NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre; Health Research Board of Ireland; UPMC Learning While Doing Program; Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium; Global Coalition for Adaptive Research; French Ministry of Health; Minderoo Foundation; Wellcome Trust Innovations Project; Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development ZonMw; NIHR Research Professorship; NIHR Clinician Scientist Fellowship; Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Career Development Fellowship; Roche Products Ltd; Sanofi (Aventis Pharma Ltd); Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB (Sobi); Faron Pharmaceuticals (drug provision in some countries)
)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / UK, Netherlands, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Finland, Italy, Saudi-Arabia Follow-up duration (days): 90 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Anakinra Initial dose: 300 mg intravenously for the first 24 hours - Maintenance dose: 100 mg intravenously 4 times a day for 14 days or until either free from invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours, or discharge from ICU. Sarilumab 400 mg IV single dose Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV infusio single dose, maximum 800 mg, a second infusion could be administered 12 to 24 hours after the first. |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Standard care=418 Anakinra=378 Sarilumab=485 Tocilizumab=972 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 2253 Mean age : NR 1536 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=4 / Severe: n=1482 Critical: n=730 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register All-cause mortality [Time Frame: Day 90]; Days alive and not receiving organ support in ICU [Time Frame: Day 21] | |
In the report An ordinal scale that is a composite of in-hospital mortality and duration of respiratory and cardiovascular organ support, censored at 21 days, where all deaths within hospital and up to day 90 were assigned the worst outcome | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the pre-print version of the article, the study registry and protocol were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The report contains definite results of tocilizumab, sarilumab and anakinra from the Immune Modulation Therapy domain of the REMAP-CAP clinical trial (an international, adaptive platform trial). There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. The platform initially included only participants admitted to an intensive care unit and receiving respiratory or cardiovascular organ support, a moderate state enrolling hospitalized participants not receiving respiratory or cardiovascular organ support was added subsequently. A blinded International Trial Steering Committee (ITSC) closed all arms of the domain on April 10, 2021. The primary outcome indicated in the registry reflects the primary outcome reported in the paper. Adverse events are not reported. |
Trial NCT04643678
Publication Elmekaty E, medRxiv (2022) (preprint)
Dates: 2020-10-30 to 2021-04-30
Funding: Public/non profit (Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / Qatar Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Anakinra Initial dose: 100 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection every 12 hours for 3 days - Maintenance dose: 100 mg SC once daily from day 4 to day 7 |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Anakinra=40 Standard care=40 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 80 Mean age : NR 66 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=0 / Severe: n=77 Critical: n=3 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Treatment Success at day 14 [ Time Frame: Day 14 ] Defined as WHO Clinical Progression score of ≤3 [Ambulatory mild disease: symptomatic; assistance needed]. | |
In the report Treatment success on day 14, defined as a WHO Clinical Progression score of ≤3 [Ambulatory mild disease: symptomatic, assistance needed] | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | “In addition to the preprint article, the retrospective study registry was used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The protocol and statistical analysis plan were not available. As the registry was retrospective, we are unable to determine if the sample size, interventions and outcomes were determined a priori." |
Trial IRCT20120703010178N20
Publication Kharazmi AB, Immun Inflamm Dis (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-05-01 to 2020-07-30
Funding: Private (Persisgen Par Pharmaceutical Company)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Single center / Iran Follow-up duration (days): 14 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Anakinra 100 mg/day intravenously for up to 14 days |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Anakinra=15 Standard care=15 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 30 Mean age : NR 19 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=9 / Severe: n=16 Critical: n=5 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1) No need for hospitalization; 2) Hospitalization without need for oxygenation therapy; 3) Hospitalization with oxygen therapy; 4) Hospitalization with receiving non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen cannula; 5) Hospitalization with receiving mechanical ventilation or extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation ; 6) Death (During first 14 days or hospitalization period) | |
In the report Need for endotracheal intubation due to hypoxemia | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the retrospective trial registry was used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. Neither protocol nor statistical analysis plan was available. The primary outcome in the article (mechanical ventilation) differed from that in the registry (score on a 7-point ordinal scale). As the registry is retrospective, there is no information on whether the sample size, outcomes or data analysis were determined a-priori. Patients in the control group were considerably older than the treatment group (mean 59.00 ± 1.79 years versus 49.25 ± 19.12) and more had hypertension (53.3% versus 13.3%), diabetes (53.3% versus 20.0%) and coronary artery disease (33.3% versus 20.0%). The study (n = 30) achieved its target sample size (n = 30). |
Trial NCT04680949; EudraCT 2020-005828-11
Publication SAVE-MORE - Kyriazopoulou E, Nat Med (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-12-23 to 2021-03-31
Funding: Mixed (Hellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis and Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB (Sobi))
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: double blinding | |
Location :
Multicenter / Greece, Italy Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Anakinra 100 mg subcutaneously once daily for 7-10 days |
|
Control
Placebo | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Placebo=194 Anakinra=412 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 606 Mean age : NR 344 males Severity : Mild: n=33 / Moderate: n=118 / Severe: n=440 Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Comparison of the distribution of frequencies of each score of a 5-scale patient state evaluated from the 11-point WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS) between the two arms of treatment [ Time Frame: 28 days ] | |
In the report Overall comparison of the distribution of frequencies of the scores from the 11-point WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS) between the two arms of treatment at Day 28 | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the published/pre-print articles, the protocol, statistical analysis plan, prospective study registries, supplementary appendices and contact with authors were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Protocol and statistical analysis plan were not available at the time of data extraction. The study achieved the target sample size specified in the trial registries. There is no change from the trial registration in the population or intervention and control treatments. Some timepoints for outcomes listed in the registry were not reported in the paper (e.g. negative viral conversion on day 7 (reported on day 28, day 7 results gained from contact with authors), serious adverse events on day 60 and 90 (reported on day 28).
This trial was updated on July 28th, 2021 with data gained from contact with authors. This trial was updated on August 25th, 2021 with day 90 data gained from further contact with authors. This trial was updated on October 25th, 2021 with data from the peer-reviewed published report. |
Trial NCT04341584
Publication CORIMUNO-ANA-1 - Mariette X, Lancet Respir Med (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-04-08 to 2020-04-26
Funding: Public/non profit (The Ministry of Health, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique, Foundation for Medical Research, and AP-HP Foundation )
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / France Follow-up duration (days): 90 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Anakinra 200 mg IV twice daily on days 1-3, 100 mg twice daily on day 4, 100 mg once daily on day 5. If no improvement on morning day 4 (>50% reduction in oxygen requirement), 200 mg twice daily days 4–6, 100mg twice daily day 7, 100 mg once daily day 8 |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Standard care=57 Anakinra=59 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 116 Mean age : NR 80 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=114 / Severe: n=0 Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Survival without needs of ventilator utilization at day 14 [ Time Frame: 14 days ]; WHO progression scale ≤ 5 [ Time Frame: 4 days ]; Cumulative incidence of successful tracheal extubation (defined as duration extubation > 48h) or withdrawal of NIV or high flow (for > 48h), at day 14 [ Time Frame: 14 days ]; Decrease of at least one point in WHO progression scale score [ Time Frame: 4 days ] | |
In the report The proportion of patients who had died or needed non-invasive or mechanical ventilation by day 4 (ie, a score of >5 points on the WHO-CPS); and Survival with no need for mechanical or non-invasive ventilation (including high- flow oxygen) at day 14. | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication:
|
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the published paper, the trial registry, statistical analysis plan and supplementary methods and results were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. The SAP was dated September 21st, 2020 and was version 2.1. This was likely after unblinded data was available for analysis hence it was not used in the risk of bias assessment of domain 5, selection of the reported result. One co-primary outcome in the registry was not reported (decrease of at least one point in WHO progression scale score), but raw data for WHO progression scale scores were reported. This was one of a series of randomized controlled trials testing different therapeutic regimens.
Quote: "On April 23, 2020, the DSMB met and recommended suspension of recruitment for futility on the basis of the interim analysis of the 102 first patients recruited, although the futility boundaries were not formally crossed. The sponsor decided to discontinue the study on April 26, 2020." As a result, the target sample size specified in the registry was not achieved. Quote: "Another trial within the CORIMUNO platform (CORIMUNO-ANA-2) that aims to assess the effect of anakinra in patients with more severe COVID-19 who are in intensive care units (WHO-CPS score ≥6 points) has now been completed and is being analysed." |