Studies included but not extracted/included in the analysis: Ilaria Mastrorosa I, SSRN, 2022; Conference abstract Mastrorosa I, Top. antivir. Med, 2022
On March 18th, 2021, we published results of the living systematic review on IL-6 blocking agents which included all preprints and published trials published online up to February 11th, 2021.
We updated the the evidence on the effectiveness and safety of IL-6 blocking agents compared to standard care alone or to a placebo for people with COVID-19. On June 1, 2023, an update of the systematic review on IL-6 blocking agents was published. It included all preprints and published trials published online up to June 7, 2022.FOREST PLOTS -2022-11-17
Trial NCT04359901
Publication Branch-Elliman W, PloS one (2022) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-04-10 to 2021-02-03
Funding: Public/non profit (NIH NHLBI; The VISN-1 Clinical Trials Network and the VA Boston Healthcare System)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / USA Follow-up duration (days): 30 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Sarilumab 400 mg subcutaneously single dose (first 9 patients received 200 mg) |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Sarilumab=20 Standard care=30 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 50 Mean age : NR 46 males Severity : Mild: n=24 / Moderate: n=* / Severe: n=* Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Intubation or death [ Time Frame: within 14 Days of enrollment ] Composite outcome of intubation or death | |
In the report A composite of intubation or death within 14 days following randomization | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Not reported |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the registry, protocol, statistical analysis plan and supplementary appendices were used in data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. The primary outcome in the article reflects that in the registry. Recruitment to the trial was terminated out of concern for the high probability that rates of intubation or death were higher in the sarilumab arm than the SOC arm, and therefore the study did not achieve its target sample size. |
Trial NCT02735707
Publication REMAP-CAP - Derde L, medRxiv (2021) (preprint)
Dates: 2020-03-25 to 2021-04-10
Funding: Mixed (PREPARE consortium by the European Union; FP7-HEALTH-2013-INNOVATION-1; RECOVER consortium by the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program; Australian National Health and Medical Research Council; Health Research Council of New Zealand; Canadian Institute of Health Research Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Innovative Clinical Trials Program Grant; UK NIHR; NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre; Health Research Board of Ireland; UPMC Learning While Doing Program; Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium; Global Coalition for Adaptive Research; French Ministry of Health; Minderoo Foundation; Wellcome Trust Innovations Project; Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development ZonMw; NIHR Research Professorship; NIHR Clinician Scientist Fellowship; Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Career Development Fellowship; Roche Products Ltd; Sanofi (Aventis Pharma Ltd); Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB (Sobi); Faron Pharmaceuticals (drug provision in some countries)
)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / UK, Netherlands, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Finland, Italy, Saudi-Arabia Follow-up duration (days): 90 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Anakinra Initial dose: 300 mg intravenously for the first 24 hours - Maintenance dose: 100 mg intravenously 4 times a day for 14 days or until either free from invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours, or discharge from ICU. Sarilumab 400 mg IV single dose Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV infusio single dose, maximum 800 mg, a second infusion could be administered 12 to 24 hours after the first. |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Standard care=418 Anakinra=378 Sarilumab=485 Tocilizumab=972 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 2253 Mean age : NR 1536 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=4 / Severe: n=1482 Critical: n=730 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register All-cause mortality [Time Frame: Day 90]; Days alive and not receiving organ support in ICU [Time Frame: Day 21] | |
In the report An ordinal scale that is a composite of in-hospital mortality and duration of respiratory and cardiovascular organ support, censored at 21 days, where all deaths within hospital and up to day 90 were assigned the worst outcome | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the pre-print version of the article, the study registry and protocol were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The report contains definite results of tocilizumab, sarilumab and anakinra from the Immune Modulation Therapy domain of the REMAP-CAP clinical trial (an international, adaptive platform trial). There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. The platform initially included only participants admitted to an intensive care unit and receiving respiratory or cardiovascular organ support, a moderate state enrolling hospitalized participants not receiving respiratory or cardiovascular organ support was added subsequently. A blinded International Trial Steering Committee (ITSC) closed all arms of the domain on April 10, 2021. The primary outcome indicated in the registry reflects the primary outcome reported in the paper. Adverse events are not reported. |
Trial NCT04357808
Publication SARCOVID - Garcia-Vicuna R, Front Med (2022) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-04-13 to 2020-10-30
Funding: Mixed (Sanofi Spain)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Single center / Spain Follow-up duration (days): 90 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Sarilumab 200 mg subcutaneous injection twice daily |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Sarilumab=20 Standard care=10 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 30 Mean age : NR 20 males Severity : Mild: n=4 / Moderate: n=22 / Severe: n=4 Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Mean change in clinical status assessment using the 7-point ordinal scale at day 7 after randomisation [Time Frame: 7 days from enrolment]; Duration of hospitalisation (days) [Time Frame: 30 days from enrolment ]; Death [Time Frame: 30 days from enrolment] | |
In the report 1) Mortality by 30 days; 2) Mean change in functional status at day 7 on a 7-category ordinal scale as recommended by the WHO R&D Blueprint Group; 3) Time to discharge from randomization | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the published article, the study registry, protocol, statistical analysis plan and the The WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group "Association Between Administration of IL-6 Antagonists and Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Meta-analysis." JAMA. 2021;326(6):499-518 were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. SARCOVID is an investigator-initiated open-label phase II RCT. There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments.
This study was updated on April 25th 2022 with data from the published report. |
Trial NCT02735707
Publication REMAP-CAP - Gordon AC, N Engl J Med (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-04-19 to 2020-11-19
Funding: Mixed (Multiple funders, internationally, with multiple regional sponsors; Roche
Products Ltd and Sanofi (drug provision in UK))
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / Australia, Ireland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, UK Follow-up duration (days): 90 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV infusion single dose over 1 hour, maximum 800 mg, a second infusion could be administered 12 to 24 hours after the first. Sarilumab 400 mg IV infusion single dose |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Tocilizumab=366 Sarilumab=48 Standard care=412 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 826 Mean age : NR 583 males Severity : Mild: n=* / Moderate: n=3 / Severe: n=567 Critical: n=233 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1. All-cause mortality [ Time Frame: Day 90 ]; 2. Days alive and not receiving organ support in ICU [ Time Frame: Day 21 ] | |
In the report Respiratory and cardiovascular organ support-free days up to day 21 | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the published report, the pre-print article, study registry and protocol were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The report contains early, preliminary results of tocilizumab and sarilumab from the Immune Modulation Therapy domain of the REMAP-CAP clinical trial (an international, adaptive platform trial); further follow-up and analysis are ongoing. As a result, long-term outcomes were not reported.
Quote: "On the basis of an interim analysis as of October 28, the independent data and safety monitoring board reported that tocilizumab had met the statistical criteria for efficacy (posterior probability, 99.75%; odds ratio, 1.87; 95% credible interval, 1.20 to 2.76). According to the protocol, further assignment to control closed on November 19, with randomization continuing between different active immune modulation interventions... After a subsequent interim analysis, the data and safety monitoring board reported that sarilumab had also met the statistical criteria for efficacy, so these results are also reported." There was some discrepancy between the report and the protocol as it pertains to time to death. The protocol pre-specifies this outcome as "ICU mortality censored at 90 days". There were no important changes from the trial registration in the population, intervention, or control treatments. Quote: "Investigators at each site prespecified at least two interventions, one of which had to be control, to which patients would be randomly assigned...Randomization to the Corticosteroid domain for Covid-19 closed on June 17, 2020. Thereafter, glucocorticoids were allowed according to the recommended standard of care." This study was updated on March 1st, 2021 with data from the published report. |
Trial NCT04324073
Publication CORIMUNO-SARI-2 - Hermine O, Eur Respir J (2022) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-03-27 to 2020-04-07
Funding: Public/non profit (Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / France Follow-up duration (days): 90 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Sarilumab 400 mg IV infusion single dose, second infusion at day 3 in absence of clinical response |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Sarilumab=50 Standard care=41 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 91 Mean age : NR 62 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=0 / Severe: n=25 Critical: n=56 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1. Survival without needs of ventilator utilization at day 14. [ Time Frame: 14 days ] Survival without needs of ventilator utilization (including non invasive ventilation and high flow) at day 14. Thus, events considered are needing ventilator utilization (including Non Invasive Ventilation, NIV or high flow), or death. New DNR order (if given after the inclusion of the patient) will be considered as an event at the date of the DNR. 2. WHO progression scale <=5 at day 4 [ Time Frame: 4 days ] Proportion of patients alive without non-invasive ventilation of high low at day 4 (WHO progression scale ≤ 5). A patient with new DNR order at day 4 will be considered as with a score > 5. WHO progression scale: Uninfected; non viral RNA detected: 0 Asymptomatic; viral RNA detected: 1 Symptomatic; Independent: 2 Symptomatic; Assistance needed: 3 Hospitalized; No oxygen therapy: 4 Hospitalized; oxygen by mask or nasal prongs: 5 Hospitalized; oxygen by NIV or High flow: 6 Intubation and Mechanical ventilation, pO2/FIO2>=150 OR SpO2/FIO2>=200: 7 Mechanical ventilation, (pO2/FIO2<150 OR SpO2/FIO2<200) OR vasopressors (norepinephrine >0.3 microg/kg/min): 8 Mechanical ventilation, pO2/FIO2<150 AND vasopressors (norepinephrine >0.3 microg/kg/min), OR Dialysis OR ECMO: 9 Dead: 10 | |
In the report 1)The early co-primary outcome is the proportion of patients with a decrease of WHO score of at least 1 point at day 4. 2) The longer-term co-primary outcome is the cumulative incidence of successful tracheal extubation (defined as duration extubation > 48h) at day 14 if patients have been intubated before day 14 or removal of NIV or high flow (for > 48h) if they were included under oxygen by NIV or High flow (score 6) and remained without intubation. | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the published article, the study registry was used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment.
Data was extracted from The WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group "Association Between Administration of IL-6 Antagonists and Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Meta-analysis." JAMA. 2021;326(6):499–518.
The study was updated on March 16th, 2022 with data from the published report. |
Trial NCT04327388; EudraCT2020-001162-12; U1111-1249-602
Publication Lescure FX, Lancet Respir Med (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-03-28 to 2020-07-03
Funding: Private (Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: double blinding | |
Location :
Multicenter / Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Russia, and Spain Follow-up duration (days): 60 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Sarilumab Sarilumab 200 200 mg IV infusion single dose, a second dose could be administered 24-48 hours after Sarilumab 400 400 mg IV infusion single dose, a second dose could be administered 24-48 hours after |
|
Control
Placebo | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Sarilumab =334 Placebo=86 Sarilumab 200=161 Sarilumab 400=173 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 754 Mean age : NR 261 males Severity : Mild: n=2 / Moderate: n=304 / Severe: n=60 Critical: n=50 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Time to improvement of 2 points in clinical status assessment from baseline using the 7-point ordinal scale [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 29 ] The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status. Score ranges 1-7. Lower score is worse. | |
In the report Time from baseline to clinical improvement of two or more points on a seven-point ordinal scale. Discharge prior to day 29 was considered as a 2-point improvement | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication:
|
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the published article, the pre-print article, the supplementary materials, the study registry, the protocol and statistical analysis plan were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. There were no substantive differences between the prospective registry and the pre-print article. The study was an adaptive design and any changes in protocol versions are reported with rationales in the article. The study achieved its pre-stated sample size. As this study was conducted in 11 countries across 45 sites, standard of care may have differed (supported by concomitant medication use presented in Table S2).
This study was updated on March 10th, 2021 with data from the published report. |
Trial NCT04324073
Publication CORIMUNO-SARI-1 - Mariette X, Lancet Rheumatol (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-03-27 to 2020-04-06
Funding: Public/non profit (Ministry of Health, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique and Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris Foundation and Foundation for Medical Research.)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / France Follow-up duration (days): 90 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Sarilumab 400 mg IV infusion single dose, second infusion at day 3 in absence of clinical response |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Sarilumab=68 Standard care=80 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 148 Mean age : NR 108 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=144 / Severe: n=0 Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register 1. Survival without needs of ventilator utilization at day 14. [ Time Frame: 14 days ] Survival without needs of ventilator utilization (including non invasive ventilation and high flow) at day 14. Thus, events considered are needing ventilator utilization (including Non Invasive Ventilation, NIV or high flow), or death. New DNR order (if given after the inclusion of the patient) will be considered as an event at the date of the DNR. 2. WHO progression scale <=5 at day 4 [ Time Frame: 4 days ] Proportion of patients alive without non-invasive ventilation of high low at day 4 (WHO progression scale ≤ 5). A patient with new DNR order at day 4 will be considered as with a score > 5. WHO progression scale: Uninfected; non viral RNA detected: 0 Asymptomatic; viral RNA detected: 1 Symptomatic; Independent: 2 Symptomatic; Assistance needed: 3 Hospitalized; No oxygen therapy: 4 Hospitalized; oxygen by mask or nasal prongs: 5 Hospitalized; oxygen by NIV or High flow: 6 Intubation and Mechanical ventilation, pO2/FIO2>=150 OR SpO2/FIO2>=200: 7 Mechanical ventilation, (pO2/FIO2<150 OR SpO2/FIO2<200) OR vasopressors (norepinephrine >0.3 microg/kg/min): 8 Mechanical ventilation, pO2/FIO2<150 AND vasopressors (norepinephrine >0.3 microg/kg/min), OR Dialysis OR ECMO: 9 Dead: 10 | |
In the report The proportion of patients dead or needing non-invasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation on day 4 (patients with a WHO-CPS score of >5) to be analysed as a binary outcome and survival with no need for non-invasive ventilation (including high-flow oxygen) or mechanical ventilation at day 14, to be analysed as a time-to-event outcome. | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
Data presented was extracted from study registry and The WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group "Association Between Administration of IL-6 Antagonists and Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Meta-analysis." JAMA. 2021;326(6):499-518. The authors have been contacted in order to obtain the results.
Data extraction was updated on the 23rd of December, 2021, after the publication of the report. There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. The registry primary outcome reflects the reported primary outcome. Some outcomes (adverse and serious adverse events) were not pre-specified in the registry. For time to mechanical ventilation or death, the bayesian adjusted analysis was utilized; adjusted on age and center. The study was updated on August 4th, 2022 with data extracted after contact with authors. |
Trial NCT04357860; EUDRACT:2020-001531-27
Publication SARICOR - Merchante N, Antimicrob. Agents C (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-07-13 to 2021-03-05
Funding: Mixed (Consejeria de Salud y Familias, Junta de Andalucia, Spain (COVID-19 Research Program); General Sub-Directorate of Networks and Cooperative Research Centers, Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases; European Regional Development Fund; Spanish Clinical Research Network; ISCIII-Sub-Directorate General for Research Assessment and Promotion)
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / Spain Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Sarilumab 200 mg subcutaneously once-off Sarilumab 400 400 mg subcutaneously single dose Sarilumab 200 200 mg subcutaneously single dose |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Sarilumab=79 Standard care=39 Sarilumab 400=40 Sarilumab 200=39 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 197 Mean age : NR 101 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=124 / Severe: n=28 Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Ventilation requirements [ Time Frame: At day 28 or when the subject is discharged (whichever occurs first) ] Proportion of patients requiring or time (in days) until required; High flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO); Non-invasive mechanical ventilation type BiPAP; Non-invasive mechanical ventilation type CPAP; Invasive mechanical ventilation | |
In the report Development of ARDS requiring HFNO, NIMV or IMV during the first 28 days after randomization. | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment | In addition to the published article, the REACT meta-analysys and study registry was used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. The registry primary outcome reflects the reported primary outcome. |
Trial EU-CTR 2020-002037-15
Publication SARTRE - Sancho-Lopez A, Infect Dis Ther (2021) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-08-04 to 2021-03-23
Funding: Private (Biomedical Research Foundation of the Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University
Hospital; Sanofi (drug donation))
Conflict of interest: No
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: Unblinded | |
Location :
Multicenter / Spain Follow-up duration (days): 28 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Sarilumab 200 mg IV infusion single dose for 1 hour (if body weight < 75 kg); 400 mg IV infusion for 1 hour (if body weight >= 75 kg) |
|
Control
Standard care | |
Participants | |
Randomized participants : Sarilumab=99 Standard care=102 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 201 Mean age : NR 141 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=201 / Severe: n=0 Critical: n=0 | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Proportion of patients progressing to severe respiratory failure (Brescia-COVID Scale ≥2), ICU admission, or death. | |
In the report Proportion of patients progressing to severe respiratory failure (Brescia-COVID equal or higher than 3, defined by the need of high frequency nasal ventilation, CPAP or noninvasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation), admission to the ICU, or death. | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol Yes. In English Statistical plan Yes Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the published article, the study registry and supplementary file were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group "Association Between Administration of IL-6 Antagonists and Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Meta-analysis." JAMA. 2021;326(6):499-518 was also available.
The registry primary outcome does not reflect the reported primary outcome. Outcomes from the registry were specified at 15 days as a timepoint vs the outcomes in report are reported at 28 days as a timepoint. The study achieved the target sample size specified in the trial registry. There is no change from the trial registration in the intervention and control treatments. This study was updated on November 18th, 2021 with data from the published journal report. This study was updated on August 4th, 2022 with data extracted after contact with authors. |
Trial NCT04315298
Publication Sivapalasingam S, Clin Infect Dis (2022) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-03-18 to 2020-07-02
Funding: Private (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Sanofi; Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority; Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: double blinding | |
Location :
Multicenter / USA Follow-up duration (days): 60 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Sarilumab 400 mg IV once-off or weekly up to 4 doses Sarilumab 400 400 mg IV infusion single dose or weekly up to 4 doses Sarilumab 200 200 mg IV infusion single dose or weekly up to 4 doses |
|
Control
Placebo | |
Participants | |
Randomized NR Analyzed 2374 participants Sarilumab =1044 Sarilumab 400=567 Sarilumab 200=477 Placebo=286 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 2374 Mean age : NR 1233 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=* / Severe: n=* Critical: n=* | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Proportion of patients with at least 1-point improvement in clinical status using the 7-point ordinal scale in patients with critical COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation at baseline [ Time Frame: Up to day 22 ] Phase 3 Cohort 1 | |
In the report Proportion of critical patients receiving MV at baseline with ≥ 1-point improvement in clinical status on a 7-point ordinal scale from baseline to day 22 (phase 3) | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the publication/pre-print articles with supplementary materials, the study registry was used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Study authors report that the trial was designed with an adaptive design allowing for changes to enrolment, interventions, and outcomes while the trial was ongoing. Several post-hoc changes were thus made to severity of patients eligible for enrolment, interventions, and outcomes during the course of the trial. Here we extracted phase 3 cohort 1. Phase 2 was also reported in this paper but extracted separately.
The study was updated on April 13th, 2022 with data from the published report. |
Trial NCT04315298
Publication Sivapalasingam S, Clin Infect Dis (2022) (published paper)
Dates: 2020-03-18 to 2020-07-02
Funding: Private (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Sanofi; Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority; Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority)
Conflict of interest: Yes
Methods | |
RCT Blinding: double blinding | |
Location :
Multicenter / USA Follow-up duration (days): 60 | |
Inclusion criteria |
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
Interventions | |
Treatment
Sarilumab 400 mg IV once-off or weekly up to 4 doses Sarilumab 400 400 mg IV infusion single dose or weekly up to 4 doses Sarilumab 200 200 mg IV infusion single dose or weekly up to 4 doses |
|
Control
Placebo | |
Participants | |
Randomized NR Analyzed 824 participants Sarilumab=367 Sarilumab 400=180 Sarilumab 200=187 Placebo=90 | |
Characteristics of participants N= 824 Mean age : NR 469 males Severity : Mild: n=0 / Moderate: n=* / Severe: n=* Critical: n=* | |
Primary outcome | |
In the register Percent change in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in patients with serum IL-6 level greater than the upper limit of normal [ Time Frame: Day 4 ] Phase 2 | |
In the report Percent change from baseline in CRP level at day 4 (phase 2) | |
Documents avalaible |
Protocol NR Statistical plan NR Data-sharing willing stated in the publication: Yes |
Risk of bias Overall The overall risk of bias reported in the table corresponds to the highest risk of bias for the outcomes assessed for the systematic review |
Some concerns |
General comment |
In addition to the published/pre-print articles, the data supplement and study registry were used in data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Study authors report that the phase 2 and 3 trial was designed with an adaptive trial design allowing for changes to enrolment, interventions, and outcomes while the trial was ongoing. Several post-hoc changes were thus made to severity eligible for enrolment, interventions, and outcomes. Here we extracted phase 2 data. Phase 3 cohorts 1 was also reported in this paper but extracted separately.
The study was updated on April 13th, 2022 with data from the published report. The study was updated on May 27th, 2022 with data extracted from the registry. |